[PATCH 42/79] link_path_walk: get rid of duplication

[Al Viro]

From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

What we do after the second walk_component() + put_link() + depth
decrement in there is exactly equivalent to what's done right
after the first walk_component().  Easy to verify and not at all
surprising, seeing that there we have just walked the last
component of nested symlink.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/namei.c | 10 ++--------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index d11165c..b740f6f 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -1763,6 +1763,7 @@ static int link_path_walk(const char *name, struct nameidata *nd)
 			return 0;
 
 		err = walk_component(nd, LOOKUP_FOLLOW);
+Walked:
 		if (err < 0)
 			return err;
 
@@ -1781,7 +1782,6 @@ static int link_path_walk(const char *name, struct nameidata *nd)
 			nd->depth++;
 			current->link_count++;
 
-l:
 			link = nd->link;
 			s = get_link(&link, nd, &cookie);
 
@@ -1818,13 +1818,7 @@ l:
 					put_link(nd, &link, cookie);
 					current->link_count--;
 					nd->depth--;
-					if (err < 0)
-						return err;
-					if (err > 0) {
-						current->link_count++;
-						nd->depth++;
-						goto l;
-					}
+					goto Walked;
 				}
 			}
 		}
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/