Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched: cpufreq_cfs: pelt-based cpu frequency scaling

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 03:10:41PM -0700, Michael Turquette wrote:
> For those that are very curious, there were recently two previous
> postings of these patches to the public eas-dev mailing list. Of
> interest in those threads is the discussion around using a utilization
> threadhold versus purely matching frequency to capacity utilization
> versus using a margin (as this series does):
> 
> https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/eas-dev/2015-April/000074.html
> https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/eas-dev/2015-April/000115.html
> 

So why wasn't that done here? (and on linux-pm of course)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/