Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] ACPI / processor: Introduce invalid_phys_cpuid()

[Hanjun Guo]

On 2015å05æ05æ 19:25, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On 05/05/15 03:46, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > Introduce invalid_phys_cpuid() to identify cpu with invalid
> > physical ID, then used it as replacement of the direct comparisons
> > with PHYS_CPUID_INVALID.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 4 ++--
> >   drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 4 ++--
> >   include/linux/acpi.h          | 5 +++++
> >   3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> > b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> > index 62c846b..92a5f73 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > index 913b49f..cc82ff3 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > @@ -163,6 +163,11 @@ static inline bool invalid_logical_cpuid(u32 cpuid)
> >       return (int)cpuid < 0;
> >   }
> >
> > +static inline bool invalid_phys_cpuid(phys_cpuid_t phys_id)
> > +{
> > +    return (int)phys_id < 0;
>
> Should this be phys_id == PHYS_CPUID_INVALID ? else I don't see why we
> need to even define PHYS_CPUID_INVALID

I'm OK with this. For now, CPU phys_id will be valid value or
PHYS_CPUID_INVALID in all cases for ACPI processor driver, but
I want ask Rafael's opinion on this, is it OK to you too, Rafael?

Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/