Re: [PATCH] sched: Handle priority boosted tasks proper in setscheduler()

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 5 May 2015 18:50:17 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Crap. Yes, I missed that. So __setscheduler() assumes that there is no
> boosting going on. So we need:
> 
>    p->prio = effective_prio(p);
> 
> there instead.

Of course then we need to do something about normalize_task() (for
sysrq), which depends on it being normal_prio().

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/