[PATCH 3.13.y-ckt 85/90] ip_forward: Drop frames with attached skb->sk

[Kamal Mostafa]

3.13.11-ckt20 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: =?UTF-8?q?Sebastian=20P=C3=B6hn?= <sebastian.poehn@xxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 2ab957492d13bb819400ac29ae55911d50a82a13 ]

Initial discussion was:
[FYI] xfrm: Don't lookup sk_policy for timewait sockets

Forwarded frames should not have a socket attached. Especially
tw sockets will lead to panics later-on in the stack.

This was observed with TPROXY assigning a tw socket and broken
policy routing (misconfigured). As a result frame enters
forwarding path instead of input. We cannot solve this in
TPROXY as it cannot know that policy routing is broken.

v2:
Remove useless comment

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Poehn <sebastian.poehn@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/ipv4/ip_forward.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_forward.c b/net/ipv4/ip_forward.c
index 31ee5c6..479e8a6 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_forward.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_forward.c
@@ -126,6 +126,9 @@ int ip_forward(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	struct rtable *rt;	/* Route we use */
 	struct ip_options *opt	= &(IPCB(skb)->opt);
 
+	if (unlikely(skb->sk))
+		goto drop;
+
 	if (skb_warn_if_lro(skb))
 		goto drop;
 
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/