[PATCH 3.13.y-ckt 27/90] powerpc/pseries: Little endian fixes for post mobility device tree update

[Kamal Mostafa]

3.13.11-ckt20 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit f6ff04149637723261aa4738958b0098b929ee9e upstream.

We currently use the device tree update code in the kernel after resuming
from a suspend operation to re-sync the kernels view of the device tree with
that of the hypervisor. The code as it stands is not endian safe as it relies
on parsing buffers returned by RTAS calls that thusly contains data in big
endian format.

This patch annotates variables and structure members with __be types as well
as performing necessary byte swaps to cpu endian for data that needs to be
parsed.

Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c
index cde4e0a..bf38292 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c
@@ -24,10 +24,10 @@
 static struct kobject *mobility_kobj;
 
 struct update_props_workarea {
-	u32 phandle;
-	u32 state;
-	u64 reserved;
-	u32 nprops;
+	__be32 phandle;
+	__be32 state;
+	__be64 reserved;
+	__be32 nprops;
 } __packed;
 
 #define NODE_ACTION_MASK	0xff000000
@@ -53,11 +53,11 @@ static int mobility_rtas_call(int token, char *buf, s32 scope)
 	return rc;
 }
 
-static int delete_dt_node(u32 phandle)
+static int delete_dt_node(__be32 phandle)
 {
 	struct device_node *dn;
 
-	dn = of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle);
+	dn = of_find_node_by_phandle(be32_to_cpu(phandle));
 	if (!dn)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static int update_dt_property(struct device_node *dn, struct property **prop,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int update_dt_node(u32 phandle, s32 scope)
+static int update_dt_node(__be32 phandle, s32 scope)
 {
 	struct update_props_workarea *upwa;
 	struct device_node *dn;
@@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ static int update_dt_node(u32 phandle, s32 scope)
 	char *prop_data;
 	char *rtas_buf;
 	int update_properties_token;
+	u32 nprops;
 	u32 vd;
 
 	update_properties_token = rtas_token("ibm,update-properties");
@@ -145,7 +146,7 @@ static int update_dt_node(u32 phandle, s32 scope)
 	if (!rtas_buf)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	dn = of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle);
+	dn = of_find_node_by_phandle(be32_to_cpu(phandle));
 	if (!dn) {
 		kfree(rtas_buf);
 		return -ENOENT;
@@ -161,6 +162,7 @@ static int update_dt_node(u32 phandle, s32 scope)
 			break;
 
 		prop_data = rtas_buf + sizeof(*upwa);
+		nprops = be32_to_cpu(upwa->nprops);
 
 		/* On the first call to ibm,update-properties for a node the
 		 * the first property value descriptor contains an empty
@@ -169,17 +171,17 @@ static int update_dt_node(u32 phandle, s32 scope)
 		 */
 		if (*prop_data == 0) {
 			prop_data++;
-			vd = *(u32 *)prop_data;
+			vd = be32_to_cpu(*(__be32 *)prop_data);
 			prop_data += vd + sizeof(vd);
-			upwa->nprops--;
+			nprops--;
 		}
 
-		for (i = 0; i < upwa->nprops; i++) {
+		for (i = 0; i < nprops; i++) {
 			char *prop_name;
 
 			prop_name = prop_data;
 			prop_data += strlen(prop_name) + 1;
-			vd = *(u32 *)prop_data;
+			vd = be32_to_cpu(*(__be32 *)prop_data);
 			prop_data += sizeof(vd);
 
 			switch (vd) {
@@ -211,13 +213,13 @@ static int update_dt_node(u32 phandle, s32 scope)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int add_dt_node(u32 parent_phandle, u32 drc_index)
+static int add_dt_node(__be32 parent_phandle, __be32 drc_index)
 {
 	struct device_node *dn;
 	struct device_node *parent_dn;
 	int rc;
 
-	parent_dn = of_find_node_by_phandle(parent_phandle);
+	parent_dn = of_find_node_by_phandle(be32_to_cpu(parent_phandle));
 	if (!parent_dn)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
@@ -236,7 +238,7 @@ static int add_dt_node(u32 parent_phandle, u32 drc_index)
 int pseries_devicetree_update(s32 scope)
 {
 	char *rtas_buf;
-	u32 *data;
+	__be32 *data;
 	int update_nodes_token;
 	int rc;
 
@@ -253,17 +255,17 @@ int pseries_devicetree_update(s32 scope)
 		if (rc && rc != 1)
 			break;
 
-		data = (u32 *)rtas_buf + 4;
-		while (*data & NODE_ACTION_MASK) {
+		data = (__be32 *)rtas_buf + 4;
+		while (be32_to_cpu(*data) & NODE_ACTION_MASK) {
 			int i;
-			u32 action = *data & NODE_ACTION_MASK;
-			int node_count = *data & NODE_COUNT_MASK;
+			u32 action = be32_to_cpu(*data) & NODE_ACTION_MASK;
+			u32 node_count = be32_to_cpu(*data) & NODE_COUNT_MASK;
 
 			data++;
 
 			for (i = 0; i < node_count; i++) {
-				u32 phandle = *data++;
-				u32 drc_index;
+				__be32 phandle = *data++;
+				__be32 drc_index;
 
 				switch (action) {
 				case DELETE_DT_NODE:
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/