Re: [Question] How does perf still record the stack of a specified pid even when that process is interrupted and CPU is scheduled to other process
From: Yunlong Song
Date: Wed May 06 2015 - 00:14:17 EST
On 2015/5/6 5:53, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 09:53:57AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 4/25/15 8:05 AM, Yunlong Song wrote:
>>> But this only shows the system call like strace, but we want the call
>>> stack of kernel functions in fact.
>>>
>> We haven't added the callchain option yet; on the to-do list.
>>
>> perf trace record -g -- iozone ...
>> perf trace -i perf.data -s
>> --> summary of system calls, max/min/average times
>>
>> perf trace -i perf.data --duration 10.0 -T
>> --> note the timestamp where the write took a "long" time
>>
>> perf script
>> --> search down to *around* the time of interest; you want the syscall
>> entry; timestamp is for exit
>
> Now if I understood the use case right, what Yulong Song wants to know
> is what the iozone process is doing in the kernel (i.e. the stacktrace of why
> exactly it goes to sleep / what it's waiting for) during these
> sys_writes which take a long time.
>
> The commands above will identify the sys_write which takes time but only
> provide the stacktrace at the entry and exit of the syscall, but this do
> not show why the process blocked or what it did inside the system call.
>
> So a way to get what is required for the use case would be to make the
> following changes to the above sequence:
>
> (1) include the sched:* events when perf trace record is run
>
> (2) around the time of interest, look at the kernel stack st the sched:switch
> events between the entry and the exit. This will show what the process was
> waiting for when it when it blocked. The stacktraces at the
> stat_runtime events in the process may also be useful to understand what
> was going on.
>
> Example:
>
> $ perf trace record -g -e sched:* -- dd if=/dev/zero of=/x bs=10M count=100 conv=fsync
> $ perf trace -i perf.data -s
>
> dd (147), 364 events, 94.3%, 0.000 msec
>
> syscall calls min avg max stddev
> --------------- -------- --------- --------- --------- ------
> write 63 266.019 316.896 963.413 4.69%
> ...
>
> $ perf trace -i perf.data --duration 960 -T
> 91916.354 (963.413 ms): dd/147 write(arg0: 1, arg1: 139729327423488, arg2: 10485760, arg3: 582, arg4: 100, arg5: 72340172838076673) = 10485760
>
> $ perf script
> ...
>
> dd 147 [002] 90.952941: raw_syscalls:sys_enter: NR 1 (1, 7f1544ed0000, a00000, 246, 64, 101010101010101)
> 211a00 syscall_trace_enter_phase2 ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 7d79c3 tracesys_phase2 ([kernel.kallsyms])
> ed20 [unknown] (/lib/libpthread-2.16.so)
>
> (... trimmed everything except the longest block: ...)
>
> dd 147 [002] 91.204723: sched:sched_switch: prev_comm=dd prev_pid=147 prev_prio=120 prev_state=D ==> next_comm=swapper/2 next_pid=0 next_prio=120
> 7d1121 __schedule ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 7d1817 schedule ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 4578a5 jbd2_log_wait_commit ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 4546ff jbd2_log_do_checkpoint ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 45489f __jbd2_log_wait_for_space ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 44c2d8 start_this_handle ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 44c7b6 jbd2__journal_start ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 42fc3b __ext4_journal_start_sb ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 4012e9 ext4_write_begin ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 33795f generic_perform_write ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 338b68 __generic_file_write_iter ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 3f4371 ext4_file_write_iter ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 381ae1 __vfs_write ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 381f07 vfs_write ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 3825dd sys_write ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 7d7a1a tracesys_phase2 ([kernel.kallsyms])
> ed20 [unknown] (/lib/libpthread-2.16.so)
>
> swapper 0 [002] 91.875573: sched:sched_wakeup: comm=dd pid=147 prio=120 success=1 target_cpu=002
>
> .
>
Good, it's clearer with "sched:*" event.
--
Thanks,
Yunlong Song
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/