Re: question about RCU dynticks_nesting

[Mike Galbraith]

On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 08:52 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 23:06 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> 
> > > 100000000 * stat() on isolated cpu
> > > 
> > > NO_HZ_FULL off        inactive     housekeeper    nohz_full
> > > real    0m14.266s     0m14.367s    0m20.427s      0m27.921s 
> > > user    0m1.756s      0m1.553s     0m1.976s       0m10.447s
> > > sys     0m12.508s     0m12.769s    0m18.400s      0m17.464s
> > > (real)  1.000         1.007        1.431          1.957
> 
> 
> > Does the attached patch help at all?
> 
> nohz_full
> 0m27.073s
> 0m9.423s
> 0m17.602s
> 
> Not a complete retest, and a pull in between, but I'd say that's a no.

(well, a second is a nice "at all", just not a _huge_ "at all";)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/