Re: [V3 PATCH 3/5] device property: Introduces device_dma_is_coherent()

[santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxxxxxx]

On 5/7/15 5:37 PM, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> Currently, device drivers, which support both OF and ACPI,
> need to call two separate APIs, of_dma_is_coherent() and
> acpi_dma_is_coherent()) to determine device coherency attribute.
>
> This patch simplifies this process by introducing a new device
> property API, device_dma_is_coherent(), which calls the appropriate
> interface based on the booting architecture.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/base/property.c  | 12 ++++++++++++
>   include/linux/property.h |  2 ++
>   2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c
> index 1d0b116..8123c6e 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/property.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>   #include <linux/export.h>
>   #include <linux/kernel.h>
>   #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>   #include <linux/property.h>
>
>   /**
> @@ -519,3 +520,14 @@ unsigned int device_get_child_node_count(struct device *dev)
>   	return count;
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_get_child_node_count);
> +
> +bool device_dma_is_coherent(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node)

Do you really need that IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) ?
In other words, dev->of_node should be null for !CONFIG_OF

Regards,
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/