Re: [PATCH 3/3] tracing/mm: Don't trace mm_page_pcpu_drain on offline cpus

From: Shreyas B Prabhu
Date: Fri May 08 2015 - 00:38:16 EST

On Wednesday 29 April 2015 10:38 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 21:28:38 +0530
> Shreyas B Prabhu <shreyas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 29 April 2015 08:48 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 20:19:28 +0530
>>> Shreyas B Prabhu <shreyas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> IIUC there is no existing macro which can both add a condition and
>>>> override printk format, hence the fall back to TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION.
>>> Hmm, want me to send you a patch that changes that?
>> I am not sure if its worth the effort now. It doesn't look like any
>> other trace point apart from the above use case will benefit from it.
>> Only smbus_write and smbus_reply seem to come close. But even they need
>> separate TP_fast_assign.
> It shouldn't be a problem to implement. But I'm currently cleaning up
> those files, and any changes will cause nasty conflicts.
> Lets do this. Push the current changes as is, and when I get around to
> adding a DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT_CONDITION(), we can modify that code to use
> it.

Hi Steve,
Do you have any other suggestions for this patchset or will you take
them as is?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at