Re: [PATCH] gpio: rcar: Check for irq_set_irq_wake() failures
From: Linus Walleij
Date: Tue May 12 2015 - 06:36:19 EST
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This should be moved to the commit message I think.
>
> So that's why I put it below the "---".
So it was below the --- and that is why I ask you to move this
useful information above the --- and into the commit message.
>>> - irq_set_irq_wake(p->irq_parent, on);
>>> + int error;
>>> +
>>> + if (p->irq_parent) {
>>> + error = irq_set_irq_wake(p->irq_parent, on);
>>> + if (error) {
>>> + dev_dbg(&p->pdev->dev,
>>> + "irq %u doesn't support irq_set_wake\n",
>>> + p->irq_parent);
>>> + p->irq_parent = 0;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>
>> Does the SH maintainers really like this... Warning
>> appear once and is squelched.
>>
>> Isn't it better to make sure it doesn't happen or something.
>>
>> It looks hacky. Any other suggestions?
>
> The first call to irq_set_irq_wake() (on = true) doesn't print a warning.
> It returns an error code, to indicate that the operation is not supported.
>
> Calling irq_set_irq_wake() again (on = false, during resume) would print
> a warning, as it wouldn't match internal state ("Unbalanced IRQ 26 wake
> disable"). That one is gone now.
Yeah :/
There are a few different patches floating for irq_set_wake() things
and some seem to be causing regressions, I just want some
broader discussion on how we solve this across all platforms.
Maybe the GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP should handle the set_wake()
similarly for all chips?
>> Also, please convert this driver to use GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
>> like everyone else.
>
> What old branch are you looking at, that it doesn't have commit
> c7f3c5d3ac2d6831 ("gpio: rcar: Switch to use gpiolib irqchip helpers")
> yet ;-)?
Argh sorry. (And that was an awesome patch.)
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/