Re: [PATCH 8/9] mtip32xx: abort secure erase operation if the device is mounted

From: Jens Axboe
Date: Tue May 12 2015 - 11:46:39 EST


On 05/11/2015 06:56 PM, Asai Thambi SP wrote:
Signed-off-by: Sam Bradshaw <sbradshaw@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Asai Thambi S P <asamymuthupa@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.c b/drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.c
index 0b223e3..f8c12e1 100644
--- a/drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.c
+++ b/drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.c
@@ -2147,6 +2147,18 @@ static int exec_drive_taskfile(struct driver_data *dd,
fis.lba_hi,
fis.device);

+ /* Check for secure erase while fs mounted */
+ if ((fis.command == ATA_CMD_SEC_ERASE_PREP) ||
+ (fis.command == ATA_CMD_SEC_ERASE_UNIT) ||
+ (fis.command == 0xFC && fis.features == 0x12)) {
+ if (dd->bdev && dd->bdev->bd_holders > 0) {
+ dev_warn(&dd->pdev->dev, "Drive erase aborted due to non-zero refcount (%d)\n",
+ dd->bdev->bd_holders);
+ err = -ERESTARTSYS;
+ goto abort;
+ }
+ }

I don't like this. If you want to do something like this, why not claim before these commands and unclaim after? If the claim fails, fail the command.


--
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/