Re: [patch v2] checkpatch: complain about GW-BASIC style label names

[Dan Carpenter]

You misunderstand.  Although I am famous for hating out: labels, I would
not introduce a checkpatch warning to complain about it.  This only
complains about GW-BASIC labels.

out3:
	kfree(foo);
out2:
	kfree(bar);
out:
	kfree(baz);

GW-BASIC label suck because they are meaningless and lazy and, if you
introduce a new warning in the middle, then you have to rename them all.
In btrfs this only complains about the following two sections of code:

fs/btrfs/compression.c
   732  
   733  fail2:
   734          while (faili >= 0) {
   735                  __free_page(cb->compressed_pages[faili]);
   736                  faili--;
   737          }
   738  
   739          kfree(cb->compressed_pages);
   740  fail1:
   741          kfree(cb);
   742  out:
   743          free_extent_map(em);
   744          return ret;
   745  }

fs/btrfs/sysfs.c
   742  
   743          return 0;
   744  out2:
   745          debugfs_remove_recursive(btrfs_debugfs_root_dentry);
   746  out1:
   747          kset_unregister(btrfs_kset);
   748  
   749          return ret;
   750  }

regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/