Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)
From: Martin Steigerwald
Date: Wed May 13 2015 - 17:11:01 EST
Am Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2015, 13:38:24 schrieb Daniel Phillips:
> On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 1:25:38 PM PDT, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2015, 12:37:41 schrieb Daniel Phillips:
> >> On 05/13/2015 12:09 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote: ...
> > Daniel, if you want to change the process of patch review and
> > inclusion into
> > the kernel, model an example of how you would like it to be. This has
> > way
> > better chances to inspire others to change their behaviors themselves
> > than accusing them of bad faith.
> > Its yours to choose.
> > What outcome do you want to create?
> The outcome I would like is:
> * Everybody has a good think about what has gone wrong in the past,
> not only with troublesome submitters, but with mutual respect and
> collegial conduct.
> * Tux3 is merged on its merits so we get more developers and
> testers and move it along faster.
> * I left LKML better than I found it.
> * Group hugs
> Well, group hugs are optional, that one would be situational.
Looking forward to it.
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/