[RFC] pointer poisoning macro
From: Vasily Kulikov
Date: Thu May 14 2015 - 07:07:59 EST
This is a raw version of the patch inspired by the discussion:
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/05/02/6.
The patch tries to achieve two goals:
1) Move "overflowed" poison pointers out of the mmap'able memory zone
2) Simplify addition of new poison pointers
The current 0x00200200 poison pointer value of LIST_POISON2 might be
too big for mmap_min_addr values equal or less than 2 MB (common case,
e.g. Ubuntu uses only 0x10000). There is little point to use such a big
value given the "poison pointer space" below 2 MB is not yet exhausted.
Changing it to a smaller value solves the problem for small
mmap_min_addr setups.
In general, poisoned pointers should meet the following criteria:
1) poisoned pointer base must be non-mmap'able (already done via
CONFIG_ILLEGAL_POINTER_VALUE)
2) all poisoned pointers (i.e. base+offset) must be non-mmap'able
3) a small offset relative to poisoned pointers must be non-mmap'able
4) poisoned pointers from different subsystems should be different
(2) can be solved at the compile time by BUILD_BUG_ON().
(3) and (4) should be solved by a creator of the new poisoned pointer.
At least (2) can be done automatically. I propose a new macro for this
purpose, POISON_POINTER(). It should check whether the poison pointer
offset is not too big. E.g. in case of too big offset the compilation
fails with the following message:
mm/page_alloc.c: In function 'free_pages_prepare':
mm/page_alloc.c:840:23: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_840' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: 0x0111400 >= POISON_AREA_SIZE
There is still an unsolved issue with the macro related to
static variables initialization. If you uncomment the line just after
"FIXME" line, you'll see:
kernel/irq/spurious.c:23:8: error: braced-group within expression allowed only inside a function
I'll be happy with the comments to the idea and the implementation.
diff --git a/include/linux/poison.h b/include/linux/poison.h
index 7b2a7fc..47b43ed 100644
--- a/include/linux/poison.h
+++ b/include/linux/poison.h
@@ -1,40 +1,54 @@
#ifndef _LINUX_POISON_H
#define _LINUX_POISON_H
+#include <linux/bug.h>
/********** include/linux/list.h **********/
/*
* Architectures might want to move the poison pointer offset
* into some well-recognized area such as 0xdead000000000000,
- * that is also not mappable by user-space exploits:
+ * that is also not mappable by user-space exploits,
+ * by adjusting CONFIG_ILLEGAL_POINTER_VALUE:
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_ILLEGAL_POINTER_VALUE
# define POISON_POINTER_DELTA _AC(CONFIG_ILLEGAL_POINTER_VALUE, UL)
#else
# define POISON_POINTER_DELTA 0
#endif
+/*
+ * Poisoned pointers of different subsystems should be different
+ * but must not move far away from POISON_POINTER_DELTA.
+ * Otherwise poisoned pointer might be mmap'able on some architectures.
+ */
+#define POISON_AREA_SIZE 0x1000
+#define POISON_POINTER(x) \
+ ({ \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(x >= POISON_AREA_SIZE); \
+ ((void *)(x) + POISON_POINTER_DELTA);})
/*
* These are non-NULL pointers that will result in page faults
* under normal circumstances, used to verify that nobody uses
* non-initialized list entries.
*/
-#define LIST_POISON1 ((void *) 0x00100100 + POISON_POINTER_DELTA)
-#define LIST_POISON2 ((void *) 0x00200200 + POISON_POINTER_DELTA)
+#define LIST_POISON1 POISON_POINTER(0x0100)
+#define LIST_POISON2 POISON_POINTER(0x0200)
/********** include/linux/timer.h **********/
/*
* Magic number "tsta" to indicate a static timer initializer
* for the object debugging code.
*/
-#define TIMER_ENTRY_STATIC ((void *) 0x74737461)
+#define TIMER_ENTRY_STATIC ((void*)0x0300 + POISON_POINTER_DELTA)
+// FIXME
+//#define TIMER_ENTRY_STATIC POISON_POINTER(0x0300)
/********** mm/debug-pagealloc.c **********/
#define PAGE_POISON 0xaa
/********** mm/page_alloc.c ************/
-#define TAIL_MAPPING ((void *) 0x01014A11 + POISON_POINTER_DELTA)
+#define TAIL_MAPPING POISON_POINTER(0x400)
/********** mm/slab.c **********/
/*
--
Vasily
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/