Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] Documentation: dmaengine: document DMA_CTRL_ACK

From: Maxime Ripard
Date: Thu May 14 2015 - 14:40:14 EST


Hi Robert,

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 07:53:26PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Add documentation about acking the transfers, and their
> reusability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/dmaengine/provider.txt | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/dmaengine/provider.txt b/Documentation/dmaengine/provider.txt
> index 05d2280..33a81ce 100644
> --- a/Documentation/dmaengine/provider.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/dmaengine/provider.txt
> @@ -345,11 +345,12 @@ where to put them)
> that abstracts it away.
>
> * DMA_CTRL_ACK
> - - Undocumented feature
> - - No one really has an idea of what it's about, besides being
> - related to reusing the DMA transaction descriptors or having
> - additional transactions added to it in the async-tx API
> - - Useless in the case of the slave API
> + - if set, the TX transfer can be reused after being completed.

Your sentences should start with an upper-case letter.

> + - there is a guarantee the TX won't be freed until it is acked
> + by async_tx_ack()

We never talked about what a "TX transfer" is in the
documentation. That should be documented.

> + - as a consequence, if a device driver wants to skip the dma_map_sg() and
> + dma_unmap_sg() because the DMA'd data wasn't used, it can resubmit the
> + transfer right after its completion.

From a provider PoV, the data should always be mapped and / or
allocated in coherent way, so I'm not sure how does that's relevant in
the provider doc.

Also, we should still mention that it's !slave API only.

Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature