When replacing an IPv6 multipath route with "ip route replace", i.e.I wonder if we should not loop over the siblings list here (rt->rt6i_siblings).
NLM_F_CREATE | NLM_F_REPLACE, fib6_add_rt2node() replaces only first
matching route without fixing its siblings, resulting in corrupted
siblings linked list; removing one of the siblings can then end in an
infinite loop.
Replacing the whole set of nexthops does IMHO make more sense than
replacing a random one. We also need to remove the NLM_F_REPLACE flag
after replacing old nexthops by first new so that each subsequent
nexthop does not replace previous one.
Fixes: 51ebd3181572 ("ipv6: add support of equal cost multipath (ECMP)")
Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@xxxxxxx>
---
net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
net/ipv6/route.c | 8 +++++---
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
index 96dbffff5a24..abf4e4e5bdab 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
@@ -815,6 +815,8 @@ add:
}
} else {
+ struct rt6_info *next;
+
if (!found) {
if (add)
goto add;
@@ -828,15 +830,24 @@ add:
*ins = rt;
rt->rt6i_node = fn;
- rt->dst.rt6_next = iter->dst.rt6_next;
+
+ /* skip potential siblings */
+ next = iter->dst.rt6_next;
+ while (next && next->rt6i_metric == rt->rt6i_metric)
+ next = next->dst.rt6_next;
+ rt->dst.rt6_next = next;Same here.
+
atomic_inc(&rt->rt6i_ref);
inet6_rt_notify(RTM_NEWROUTE, rt, info);
if (!(fn->fn_flags & RTN_RTINFO)) {
info->nl_net->ipv6.rt6_stats->fib_route_nodes++;
fn->fn_flags |= RTN_RTINFO;
}
- fib6_purge_rt(iter, fn, info->nl_net);
- rt6_release(iter);
+ while (iter != next) {
+ fib6_purge_rt(iter, fn, info->nl_net);
+ rt6_release(iter);
+ iter = iter->dst.rt6_next;
+ }