Re: [PATCH 3/4] edac, altera: Addition of Arria10 EDAC
From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Fri May 15 2015 - 06:58:17 EST
On Wednesday 13 May 2015 16:49:46 tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> +static int a10_unmask_irq(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 mask)
> +{
> + void __iomem *sm_base;
> +
> + if (!devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, A10_SYMAN_INTMASK_CLR,
> + sizeof(u32), dev_name(&pdev->dev))) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_MC,
> + "Unable to request mem region\n");
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + sm_base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, A10_SYMAN_INTMASK_CLR,
> + sizeof(u32));
> + if (!sm_base) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_MC,
> + "Unable to ioremap device\n");
> +
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + iowrite32(mask, sm_base);
> +
> + devm_iounmap(&pdev->dev, sm_base);
> + devm_release_mem_region(&pdev->dev, A10_SYMAN_INTMASK_CLR,
> + sizeof(u32));
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
If you always unmap right away, better use the normal request_mem_region
and ioremap functions rather than their devm counterparts.
>
> + /* Only the Arria10 has separate IRQs */
> + if (irq2 > 0) {
> + /* Arria10 specific initialization */
> + res = a10_init(mc_vbase);
> + if (res < 0)
> + goto err2;
> +
> + res = a10_unmask_irq(pdev, A10_DDR0_IRQ_MASK);
> + if (res < 0)
> + goto err2;
> +
> + res = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq2,
> + altr_sdram_mc_err_handler,
> + IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(&pdev->dev), mci);
> + if (res < 0) {
> + edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR,
> + "Unable to request irq %d\n", irq2);
> + res = -ENODEV;
> + goto err2;
> + }
> + irqflags = IRQF_SHARED;
> + }
> +
>
Should the unmask be done after the request?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/