Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] iommu: add ARM short descriptor page table allocator.

From: Robin Murphy
Date: Fri May 15 2015 - 11:31:09 EST

Next message: Hans Ulli Kroll: "[PATCHv5] RTC:driver for Cortina's SOC"
Previous message: Mark Rutland: "Re: [PATCH v4 10/12] KVM: arm64: guest debug, HW assisted debug support"
In reply to: Yong Wu: "[PATCH v2 3/6] iommu: add ARM short descriptor page table allocator."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Oops, seems I'm rather behind on things - I started this review on the RFC, but I'll finish it here...

On 15/05/15 10:43, Yong Wu wrote:

This patch is for ARM Short Descriptor Format.It has 2-levels
pagetable and the allocator supports 4K/64K/1M/16M.

From the look of the code, this doesn't fully support partial unmaps (i.e. splitting block entries), am I right? That's OK for DMA-API use, since that doesn't permit partial unmaps anyway, but I'd say it's worth making it clear that that's still a TODO in order for short-descriptor mappings to fully support arbitrary raw IOMMU API usage.

Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 7 +
drivers/iommu/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-short.c | 490 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/iommu/io-pgtable.c | 4 +
drivers/iommu/io-pgtable.h | 6 +
5 files changed, 508 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-short.c

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
index 1ae4e54..3d2eac6 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
@@ -39,6 +39,13 @@ config IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_LPAE_SELFTEST

If unsure, say N here.

+config IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_SHORT
+ bool "ARMv7/v8 Short Descriptor Format"
+ select IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE
+ help
+ Enable support for the ARM Short descriptor pagetable format.
+ It has 2-levels pagetable and The allocator supports 4K/64K/1M/16M.
+
endmenu

config IOMMU_IOVA
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Makefile b/drivers/iommu/Makefile
index 080ffab..815b3c8 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/iommu/Makefile
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_IOMMU_API) += iommu-traces.o
obj-$(CONFIG_IOMMU_API) += iommu-sysfs.o
obj-$(CONFIG_IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE) += io-pgtable.o
obj-$(CONFIG_IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_LPAE) += io-pgtable-arm.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_SHORT) += io-pgtable-arm-short.o
obj-$(CONFIG_IOMMU_IOVA) += iova.o
obj-$(CONFIG_OF_IOMMU) += of_iommu.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MSM_IOMMU) += msm_iommu.o msm_iommu_dev.o
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-short.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-short.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cc286ce5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-short.c
@@ -0,0 +1,490 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2014-2015 MediaTek Inc.
+ * Author: Yong Wu <yong.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ */
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "arm-short-desc io-pgtable: "fmt
+
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/iommu.h>
+#include <linux/errno.h>

Alphabetically-sorted includes, please. Also, this list doesn't look particularly correct - e.g. I don't think you're actually using anything from mm.h, but you are relying on stuff from kernel.h, slab.h, gfp.h, etc. being pulled in indirectly.

+
+#include "io-pgtable.h"
+
+typedef u32 arm_short_iopte;
+
+struct arm_short_io_pgtable {
+ struct io_pgtable iop;
+ struct kmem_cache *ptekmem;
+ size_t pgd_size;
+ void *pgd;
+};
+
+#define io_pgtable_short_to_data(x) \
+ container_of((x), struct arm_short_io_pgtable, iop)
+
+#define io_pgtable_ops_to_pgtable(x) \
+ container_of((x), struct io_pgtable, ops)

This macro may as well be factored out into io-pgtable.h before duplication spreads any further. I don't see any reason for it not to live alongside the definition of struct io_pgtable, anyway.

+
+#define io_pgtable_short_ops_to_data(x) \
+ io_pgtable_short_to_data(io_pgtable_ops_to_pgtable(x))
+
+#define ARM_SHORT_MAX_ADDR_BITS 32
+
+#define ARM_SHORT_PGDIR_SHIFT 20
+#define ARM_SHORT_PAGE_SHIFT 12
+#define ARM_SHORT_PTRS_PER_PTE 256
+#define ARM_SHORT_BYTES_PER_PTE 1024
+
+/* 1 level pagetable */
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_TYPE_PAGE (0x1)
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_TYPE_PAGE_MSK (0x3)
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_TYPE_SECTION (0x2)
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_TYPE_SUPERSECTION (0x2 | (1 << 18))
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_TYPE_SECTION_MSK (0x3 | (1 << 18))
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_TYPE_IS_PAGE(pgd) (((pgd) & 0x3) == 1)

This confused me on first glance looking at the places it's used, because it's not actually referring to a thing which is a page. Maybe ..._IS_TABLE would be a better name?

+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_TYPE_IS_SECTION(pgd) \
+ (((pgd) & ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_TYPE_SECTION_MSK) \
+ == ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_TYPE_SECTION)
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_TYPE_IS_SUPERSECTION(pgd) \
+ (((pgd) & ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_TYPE_SECTION_MSK) \
+ == ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_TYPE_SUPERSECTION)
+
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_B_BIT BIT(2)
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_C_BIT BIT(3)
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_IMPLE_BIT BIT(9)
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_S_BIT BIT(16)
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_NG_BIT BIT(17)
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_NS_BIT_PAGE BIT(3)
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_NS_BIT_SECTION BIT(19)
+
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_PA_PAGETABLE_MSK 0xfffffc00
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_PA_SECTION_MSK 0xfff00000
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_PA_SUPERSECTION_MSK 0xff000000
+
+/* 2 level pagetable */
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PTE_TYPE_GET(val) ((val) & 0x3)
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PTE_TYPE_LARGE BIT(0)
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PTE_TYPE_SMALL BIT(1)
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PTE_B_BIT BIT(2)
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PTE_C_BIT BIT(3)
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PTE_IMPLE_BIT BIT(9)
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PTE_S_BIT BIT(10)
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PTE_PA_LARGE_MSK 0xffff0000
+#define ARM_SHORT_F_PTE_PA_SMALL_MSK 0xfffff000
+
+#define ARM_SHORT_PGD_IDX(a) ((a) >> ARM_SHORT_PGDIR_SHIFT)
+#define ARM_SHORT_PTE_IDX(a) \
+ (((a) >> ARM_SHORT_PAGE_SHIFT) & 0xff)
+#define ARM_SHORT_GET_PTE_VA(pgd) \
+ (phys_to_virt((unsigned long)pgd & ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_PA_PAGETABLE_MSK))
+
+static arm_short_iopte *
+arm_short_get_pte_in_pgd(arm_short_iopte curpgd, unsigned int iova)
+{
+ arm_short_iopte *pte;
+
+ pte = ARM_SHORT_GET_PTE_VA(curpgd);
+ pte += ARM_SHORT_PTE_IDX(iova);
+ return pte;
+}
+
+static arm_short_iopte *
+arm_short_supersection_start(arm_short_iopte *pgd)
+{
+ return (arm_short_iopte *)(round_down((unsigned long)pgd, (16 * 4)));
+}
+
+static int _arm_short_check_free_pte(struct arm_short_io_pgtable *data,
+ arm_short_iopte *pgd)

Given that this is only returning success/failure, it should probably be bool rather than int.

+{
+ arm_short_iopte *pte;
+ int i;
+
+ pte = ARM_SHORT_GET_PTE_VA(*pgd);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARM_SHORT_PTRS_PER_PTE; i++) {
+ if (pte[i] != 0)
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ /* Free PTE */
+ kmem_cache_free(data->ptekmem, pte);
+ *pgd = 0;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static phys_addr_t arm_short_iova_to_phys(struct io_pgtable_ops *ops,
+ unsigned long iova)
+{
+ struct arm_short_io_pgtable *data = io_pgtable_short_ops_to_data(ops);
+ arm_short_iopte *pte, *pgd = data->pgd;
+ phys_addr_t pa = 0;
+
+ pgd += ARM_SHORT_PGD_IDX(iova);
+
+ if (ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_TYPE_IS_PAGE(*pgd)) {
+ u8 pte_type;
+
+ pte = arm_short_get_pte_in_pgd(*pgd, iova);
+ pte_type = ARM_SHORT_F_PTE_TYPE_GET(*pte);
+
+ if (pte_type == ARM_SHORT_F_PTE_TYPE_LARGE) {
+ pa = (*pte) & ARM_SHORT_F_PTE_PA_LARGE_MSK;
+ pa |= iova & (~ARM_SHORT_F_PTE_PA_LARGE_MSK);
+ } else if (pte_type == ARM_SHORT_F_PTE_TYPE_SMALL) {
+ pa = (*pte) & ARM_SHORT_F_PTE_PA_SMALL_MSK;
+ pa |= iova & (~ARM_SHORT_F_PTE_PA_SMALL_MSK);
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_TYPE_IS_SECTION(*pgd)) {
+ pa = (*pgd) & ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_PA_SECTION_MSK;
+ pa |= iova & (~ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_PA_SECTION_MSK);
+ } else if (ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_TYPE_IS_SUPERSECTION(*pgd)) {
+ pa = (*pgd) & ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_PA_SUPERSECTION_MSK;
+ pa |= iova & (~ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_PA_SUPERSECTION_MSK);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return pa;
+}
+
+static int arm_short_unmap(struct io_pgtable_ops *ops, unsigned long iova,
+ size_t size)
+{
+ struct arm_short_io_pgtable *data = io_pgtable_short_ops_to_data(ops);
+ arm_short_iopte *pgd;
+ unsigned long iova_start = iova;
+ unsigned long long end_plus_1 = iova + size;

Since everything's at page granularity, working with IOVA PFNs rather than raw addresses might be more convenient, and also sidesteps the 32-bit overflow problem. On 64-bit platforms, we're wasting a whole 95 bits of a long long here ;)

+ const struct iommu_gather_ops *tlb = data->iop.cfg.tlb;
+ void *cookie = data->iop.cookie;
+ int ret;
+
+ do {
+ pgd = (arm_short_iopte *)data->pgd + ARM_SHORT_PGD_IDX(iova);
+
+ if (ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_TYPE_IS_PAGE(*pgd)) {
+ arm_short_iopte *pte;
+ unsigned int pte_offset;
+ unsigned int num_to_clean;
+
+ pte_offset = ARM_SHORT_PTE_IDX(iova);
+ num_to_clean =
+ min((unsigned int)((end_plus_1 - iova) / PAGE_SIZE),

Shouldn't this be page size for the IOMMU, not the CPU? I'm a bit slow today, but this looks like it might go wrong when PAGE_SIZE > 4K.

+ (ARM_SHORT_PTRS_PER_PTE - pte_offset));
+
+ pte = arm_short_get_pte_in_pgd(*pgd, iova);
+
+ memset(pte, 0, num_to_clean * sizeof(arm_short_iopte));
+
+ ret = _arm_short_check_free_pte(data, pgd);
+ if (ret == 1)/* pte is not freed, need to flush pte */
+ tlb->flush_pgtable(
+ pte,
+ num_to_clean * sizeof(arm_short_iopte),
+ cookie);
+ else
+ tlb->flush_pgtable(pgd, sizeof(arm_short_iopte),
+ cookie);
+
+ iova += num_to_clean << PAGE_SHIFT;
+ } else if (ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_TYPE_IS_SECTION(*pgd)) {
+ *pgd = 0;
+
+ tlb->flush_pgtable(pgd, sizeof(arm_short_iopte),
+ cookie);
+ iova += SZ_1M;
+ } else if (ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_TYPE_IS_SUPERSECTION(*pgd)) {
+ arm_short_iopte *start;
+
+ start = arm_short_supersection_start(pgd);
+ if (unlikely(start != pgd))
+ pr_warn("%s:suppersection start isn't aligned.iova=0x%lx,pgd=0x%x\n",

Nit: typo in "supersection" here.

+ __func__, iova, *pgd);
+
+ memset(start, 0, 16 * sizeof(arm_short_iopte));
+
+ tlb->flush_pgtable(start, 16 * sizeof(arm_short_iopte),
+ cookie);
+
+ iova = (iova + SZ_16M) & (~(SZ_16M - 1));

iova = ALIGN(iova + SZ_16M, SZ_16M);

Except that being unaligned in the first place is an error condition, so it would make more sense to just have "iova += SZ_16M;" here, and put "iova = ALIGN(iova, SZ_16M) after the warning in the error path above.

Since you don't handle splitting block mappings, and you also seem to be missing an equivalent warning for unaligned second-level large pages, it might be better to simply return an error if the requested size and alignment don't exactly match the type of entry found, rather than let the page tables get into an unexpectedly inconsistent state.

+ } else {
+ break;
+ }
+ } while (iova < end_plus_1 && iova);
+
+ tlb->tlb_add_flush(iova_start, size, true, cookie);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static arm_short_iopte __arm_short_pte_port(unsigned int prot, bool large)

I assume _port is a typo of _prot

+{
+ arm_short_iopte pteprot;
+
+ pteprot = ARM_SHORT_F_PTE_S_BIT;
+
+ pteprot |= large ? ARM_SHORT_F_PTE_TYPE_LARGE :
+ ARM_SHORT_F_PTE_TYPE_SMALL;
+
+ if (prot & IOMMU_CACHE)
+ pteprot |= ARM_SHORT_F_PTE_B_BIT | ARM_SHORT_F_PTE_C_BIT;
+
+ return pteprot;
+}
+
+static arm_short_iopte __arm_short_pgd_port(int prot, bool super)

Ditto

+{
+ arm_short_iopte pgdprot;
+
+ pgdprot = ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_S_BIT;
+ pgdprot |= super ? ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_TYPE_SUPERSECTION :
+ ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_TYPE_SECTION;
+ if (prot & IOMMU_CACHE)
+ pgdprot |= ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_C_BIT | ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_B_BIT;
+
+ return pgdprot;
+}
+
+static int _arm_short_map_page(struct arm_short_io_pgtable *data,
+ unsigned int iova, phys_addr_t pa,
+ unsigned int prot, bool largepage)
+{
+ arm_short_iopte *pgd = data->pgd;
+ arm_short_iopte *pte;
+ arm_short_iopte pgdprot, pteprot;
+ arm_short_iopte mask = largepage ? ARM_SHORT_F_PTE_PA_LARGE_MSK :
+ ARM_SHORT_F_PTE_PA_SMALL_MSK;
+ int i, ptenum = largepage ? 16 : 1;
+ bool ptenew = false;
+ void *pte_new_va;
+ void *cookie = data->iop.cookie;
+
+ if ((iova | pa) & (~mask)) {
+ pr_err("IOVA|PA Not Aligned(iova=0x%x pa=0x%pa type=%s)\n",
+ iova, &pa, largepage ? "large page" : "small page");

Nit: you may as well just have largepage ? "large" : "small" here and "...type=%s page..." in the format string.

+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ pgdprot = ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_TYPE_PAGE;
+ if (data->iop.cfg.quirks & IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_NS)
+ pgdprot |= ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_NS_BIT_PAGE;
+
+ pgd += ARM_SHORT_PGD_IDX(iova);
+
+ if (!(*pgd)) {
+ pte_new_va = kmem_cache_zalloc(data->ptekmem, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (unlikely(!pte_new_va)) {
+ pr_err("Failed to alloc pte\n");

The allocator should already print the details of a failure, so I don't think this adds much.

+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ /* Check pte alignment -- must 1K align */
+ if (unlikely((unsigned long)pte_new_va &
+ (ARM_SHORT_BYTES_PER_PTE - 1))) {
+ pr_err("The new pte is not aligned! (va=0x%p)\n",
+ pte_new_va);
+ kmem_cache_free(data->ptekmem, (void *)pte_new_va);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }

Can this ever actually happen? Besides, if kmem_cache_alloc isn't honouring the alignment specified in kmem_cache_create, I think the kernel might have bigger problems anyway...

+ ptenew = true;
+ *pgd = virt_to_phys(pte_new_va) | pgdprot;
+ kmemleak_ignore(pte_new_va);
+ data->iop.cfg.tlb->flush_pgtable(pgd, sizeof(arm_short_iopte),
+ cookie);
+ } else {
+ /* Someone else may have allocated for this pgd */
+ if (((*pgd) & (~ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_PA_PAGETABLE_MSK)) != pgdprot) {
+ pr_err("The prot of old pgd is not Right!iova=0x%x pgd=0x%x pgprot=0x%x\n",
+ iova, (*pgd), pgdprot);
+ return -EEXIST;
+ }
+ }
+
+ pteprot = (arm_short_iopte)pa;
+ pteprot |= __arm_short_pte_port(prot, largepage);
+
+ pte = arm_short_get_pte_in_pgd(*pgd, iova);
+
+ pr_debug("iova:0x%x,pte:0x%p(0x%x),prot:0x%x-%s\n",
+ iova, pte, ARM_SHORT_PTE_IDX(iova), pteprot,
+ largepage ? "large page" : "small page");

String redundancy nit again, assuming we actually need the debug output at all.

+
+ for (i = 0; i < ptenum; i++) {
+ if (pte[i]) {
+ pr_err("The To-Map pte exists!(iova=0x%x pte=0x%x i=%d)\n",
+ iova, pte[i], i);
+ goto err_out;
+ }
+ pte[i] = pteprot;
+ }
+
+ data->iop.cfg.tlb->flush_pgtable(pte, ptenum * sizeof(arm_short_iopte),
+ cookie);
+ return 0;
+
+ err_out:
+ for (i--; i >= 0; i--)

Probably bikeshedding, but I actually had to stop and think to work out that this wasn't anything more special than while(i--)...

+ pte[i] = 0;
+ if (ptenew)
+ kmem_cache_free(data->ptekmem, pte_new_va);
+ return -EEXIST;
+}
+
+static int _arm_short_map_section(struct arm_short_io_pgtable *data,
+ unsigned int iova, phys_addr_t pa,
+ int prot, bool supersection)
+{
+ arm_short_iopte pgprot;
+ arm_short_iopte mask = supersection ?
+ ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_PA_SUPERSECTION_MSK :
+ ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_PA_SECTION_MSK;
+ arm_short_iopte *pgd = data->pgd;
+ int i;
+ unsigned int pgdnum = supersection ? 16 : 1;
+
+ if ((iova | pa) & (~mask)) {
+ pr_err("IOVA|PA Not Aligned(iova=0x%x pa=0x%pa type=%s)\n",
+ iova, &pa, supersection ? "supersection" : "section");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ pgprot = (arm_short_iopte)pa;
+
+ if (data->iop.cfg.quirks & IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_NS)
+ pgprot |= ARM_SHORT_F_PGD_NS_BIT_SECTION;
+
+ pgprot |= __arm_short_pgd_port(prot, supersection);
+
+ pgd += ARM_SHORT_PGD_IDX(iova);
+
+ pr_debug("iova:0x%x,pgd:0x%p(0x%p+0x%x),value:0x%x-%s\n",
+ iova, pgd, data->pgd, ARM_SHORT_PGD_IDX(iova),
+ pgprot, supersection ? "supersection" : "section");
+
+ for (i = 0; i < pgdnum; i++) {
+ if (unlikely(*pgd)) {
+ pr_err("The To-Map pdg exists!(iova=0x%x pgd=0x%x i=%d)\n",

Typo of "pgd" here

+ iova, pgd[i], i);
+ goto err_out;
+ }
+ pgd[i] = pgprot;
+ }
+ data->iop.cfg.tlb->flush_pgtable(pgd,
+ pgdnum * sizeof(arm_short_iopte),
+ data->iop.cookie);
+ return 0;
+
+ err_out:
+ for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
+ pgd[i] = 0;
+ return -EEXIST;
+}
+
+static int arm_short_map(struct io_pgtable_ops *ops, unsigned long iova,
+ phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size, int prot)
+{
+ struct arm_short_io_pgtable *data = io_pgtable_short_ops_to_data(ops);
+ const struct iommu_gather_ops *tlb = data->iop.cfg.tlb;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!(prot & (IOMMU_READ | IOMMU_WRITE)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (size == SZ_4K) {/* most case */
+ ret = _arm_short_map_page(data, iova, paddr, prot, false);
+ } else if (size == SZ_64K) {
+ ret = _arm_short_map_page(data, iova, paddr, prot, true);
+ } else if (size == SZ_1M) {
+ ret = _arm_short_map_section(data, iova, paddr, prot, false);
+ } else if (size == SZ_16M) {
+ ret = _arm_short_map_section(data, iova, paddr, prot, true);
+ } else {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ }

I think this might be nicer as a switch statement. You could perhaps move the add_flush beforehand (since it's unconditional here anyway) and get rid of ret altogether.

Alternatively, given that map_page and map_section are so similar, maybe it's worth sorting out the pgprot and pgd/pte pointer for the page/section distinction here, then just passing those to a single function which maps compound/non-compound leaf entries.

+ tlb->tlb_add_flush(iova, size, true, data->iop.cookie);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static struct io_pgtable *
+arm_short_alloc_pgtable(struct io_pgtable_cfg *cfg, void *cookie)
+{
+ struct arm_short_io_pgtable *data;
+
+ if (cfg->ias != 32)
+ return NULL;
+
+ if (cfg->oas > ARM_SHORT_MAX_ADDR_BITS)
+ return NULL;
+
+ cfg->pgsize_bitmap &= SZ_4K | SZ_64K | SZ_1M | SZ_16M;
+
+ data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!data)
+ return NULL;
+
+ data->pgd_size = SZ_16K;
+
+ data->pgd = alloc_pages_exact(data->pgd_size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);

I think this needs __GFP_DMA too, to ensure the pgd lies below the 4GB boundary on arm64/LPAE systems with memory above that.

+ if (!data->pgd)
+ goto out_free_data;
+
+ cfg->tlb->flush_pgtable(data->pgd, data->pgd_size, cookie);
+
+ /* kmem for pte */
+ data->ptekmem = kmem_cache_create("short-descriptor-pte",
+ ARM_SHORT_BYTES_PER_PTE,
+ ARM_SHORT_BYTES_PER_PTE,
+ 0, NULL);
+
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data->ptekmem)) {
+ pr_err("Failed to Create cached mem for PTE %ld\n",
+ PTR_ERR(data->ptekmem));
+ goto out_free_pte;
+ }
+
+ /* TTBRs */
+ cfg->arm_short_cfg.ttbr[0] = virt_to_phys(data->pgd);
+ cfg->arm_short_cfg.ttbr[1] = 0;
+
+ cfg->arm_short_cfg.tcr = 0;
+
+ data->iop.ops = (struct io_pgtable_ops) {
+ .map = arm_short_map,
+ .unmap = arm_short_unmap,
+ .iova_to_phys = arm_short_iova_to_phys,
+ };
+
+ return &data->iop;
+
+out_free_pte:
+ free_pages_exact(data->pgd, data->pgd_size);
+out_free_data:
+ kfree(data);
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static void arm_short_free_pgtable(struct io_pgtable *iop)
+{
+ struct arm_short_io_pgtable *data = io_pgtable_short_to_data(iop);
+
+ kmem_cache_destroy(data->ptekmem);
+ free_pages_exact(data->pgd, data->pgd_size);
+ kfree(data);
+}
+
+struct io_pgtable_init_fns io_pgtable_arm_short_init_fns = {
+ .alloc = arm_short_alloc_pgtable,
+ .free = arm_short_free_pgtable,
+};
+
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable.c
index 6436fe2..14a9b3a 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ extern struct io_pgtable_init_fns io_pgtable_arm_32_lpae_s1_init_fns;
extern struct io_pgtable_init_fns io_pgtable_arm_32_lpae_s2_init_fns;
extern struct io_pgtable_init_fns io_pgtable_arm_64_lpae_s1_init_fns;
extern struct io_pgtable_init_fns io_pgtable_arm_64_lpae_s2_init_fns;
+extern struct io_pgtable_init_fns io_pgtable_arm_short_init_fns;

static const struct io_pgtable_init_fns *
io_pgtable_init_table[IO_PGTABLE_NUM_FMTS] =
@@ -38,6 +39,9 @@ io_pgtable_init_table[IO_PGTABLE_NUM_FMTS] =
[ARM_64_LPAE_S1] = &io_pgtable_arm_64_lpae_s1_init_fns,
[ARM_64_LPAE_S2] = &io_pgtable_arm_64_lpae_s2_init_fns,
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_SHORT
+ [ARM_SHORT_DESC] = &io_pgtable_arm_short_init_fns,
+#endif
};

struct io_pgtable_ops *alloc_io_pgtable_ops(enum io_pgtable_fmt fmt,
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable.h b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable.h
index 10e32f6..47efaab 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable.h
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ enum io_pgtable_fmt {
ARM_32_LPAE_S2,
ARM_64_LPAE_S1,
ARM_64_LPAE_S2,
+ ARM_SHORT_DESC,
IO_PGTABLE_NUM_FMTS,
};

@@ -62,6 +63,11 @@ struct io_pgtable_cfg {
u64 vttbr;
u64 vtcr;
} arm_lpae_s2_cfg;
+
+ struct {
+ u64 ttbr[2];
+ u64 tcr;

The ARM ARM defines these all as 32-bit registers for the short-descriptor format, so I think u32 would be more appropriate - better to let the compiler truncate things and warn about it, than have the hardware do it silently at runtime ;)

+ } arm_short_cfg;
};
};

--
1.8.1.1.dirty

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Hans Ulli Kroll: "[PATCHv5] RTC:driver for Cortina's SOC"
Previous message: Mark Rutland: "Re: [PATCH v4 10/12] KVM: arm64: guest debug, HW assisted debug support"
In reply to: Yong Wu: "[PATCH v2 3/6] iommu: add ARM short descriptor page table allocator."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]