Re: Is there anyway to do direct mapped cache on Intel hardware?
From: Richard Yao
Date: Mon May 18 2015 - 14:33:41 EST
It seems that there are ways:
"These are officially undocumented modes known as "cache-as-RAM mode" in
AMD land an "no-fill mode" in Intel's"
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19591500/how-to-make-sure-a-piece-of-code-never-leaves-the-cpu-cache-l3/24710093#24710093
Now all I need to do is take time during my weekend to figure out how to
do it. My apologies for the noise.
On 05/18/2015 02:07 PM, Richard Yao wrote:
> Is there anyway to do direct mapped cache on Intel hardware?
>
> Direct mapped cache should allow me to implement software ECC via the
> low memory / high memory split. It would be slow, but I would prefer to
> have a slow laptop than one that is vulnerable to bit flips.
>
> If direct mapped cache is possible and non-NUMA systems could avoid
> writing it back/through, I imagine that people could also protect
> against cold boot attacks by encrypting main memory. This would be also
> be slow, but the AES instructions that Intel's newer processors are
> supposed to have should keep the slowdown within some reasonable bound.
>
> There might also be applications for using external memory algorithms
> (e.g. fractal tree indexes) to speed up in-memory operations. I also am
> not sure if the difference between system memory and cache is big enough
> to make it a win, but I am sure that is not something that I would want
> to implement on my laptop in my spare time.
>
> If someone knows a way to do direct mapped cache, please share.
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature