Re: [RFC] block: remove never-modified global variable
From: Boaz Harrosh
Date: Tue May 19 2015 - 03:19:24 EST
On 05/19/2015 02:08 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
> AFAICT, 'warn_no_part' never takes (and never has? at least, not in the
> git history) taken a value besides 1. It also has a disgruntled warning
> comment next to it, suggesting it shouldn't be there at all.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I have also tested it by returning error from read of sector zero.
And the print prints. Of course. No one ever turns it off.
Some comments
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxx>
> ---
> Only compile tested for now, as it's trivial. Just an RFC, since I don't really
> understand the context of why this (or the comment) is here in the first place.
> I just ran across this in code reading.
>
> block/partitions/amiga.c | 10 ++++------
> block/partitions/check.c | 7 ++-----
> block/partitions/check.h | 2 --
> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/partitions/amiga.c b/block/partitions/amiga.c
> index 2b13533d60a2..9dbf1cec7152 100644
> --- a/block/partitions/amiga.c
> +++ b/block/partitions/amiga.c
> @@ -41,9 +41,8 @@ int amiga_partition(struct parsed_partitions *state)
> goto rdb_done;
> data = read_part_sector(state, blk, §);
> if (!data) {
> - if (warn_no_part)
> - pr_err("Dev %s: unable to read RDB block %d\n",
> - bdevname(state->bdev, b), blk);
> + pr_err("Dev %s: unable to read RDB block %d\n",
> + bdevname(state->bdev, b), blk);
> res = -1;
> goto rdb_done;
> }
> @@ -84,9 +83,8 @@ int amiga_partition(struct parsed_partitions *state)
> blk *= blksize; /* Read in terms partition table understands */
> data = read_part_sector(state, blk, §);
> if (!data) {
> - if (warn_no_part)
> - pr_err("Dev %s: unable to read partition block %d\n",
> - bdevname(state->bdev, b), blk);
> + pr_err("Dev %s: unable to read partition block %d\n",
> + bdevname(state->bdev, b), blk);
> res = -1;
> goto rdb_done;
> }
> diff --git a/block/partitions/check.c b/block/partitions/check.c
> index 16118d11dbfc..513c601b7874 100644
> --- a/block/partitions/check.c
> +++ b/block/partitions/check.c
> @@ -36,8 +36,6 @@
> #include "sysv68.h"
> #include "cmdline.h"
>
> -int warn_no_part = 1; /*This is ugly: should make genhd removable media aware*/
> -
> static int (*check_part[])(struct parsed_partitions *) = {
> /*
> * Probe partition formats with tables at disk address 0
> @@ -185,9 +183,8 @@ check_partition(struct gendisk *hd, struct block_device *bdev)
> /* The partition is unrecognized. So report I/O errors if there were any */
> res = err;
> if (res) {
> - if (warn_no_part)
> - strlcat(state->pp_buf,
> - " unable to read partition table\n", PAGE_SIZE);
> + strlcat(state->pp_buf,
> + " unable to read partition table\n", PAGE_SIZE);
OK I admit this was kind of very dumb before, If theoretically warn_no_part
would be false then the system would print "disk_name:\n" and nothing
else.
But specially now that you are unconditionally printing it. It is better
to just combine the two statements. See suggested patch below:
> printk(KERN_INFO "%s", state->pp_buf);
> }
>
> diff --git a/block/partitions/check.h b/block/partitions/check.h
> index eade17ea910b..e09fac216adc 100644
> --- a/block/partitions/check.h
> +++ b/block/partitions/check.h
> @@ -50,5 +50,3 @@ put_partition(struct parsed_partitions *p, int n, sector_t from, sector_t size)
> }
> }
>
> -extern int warn_no_part;
> -
>
diff --git a/block/partitions/check.c b/block/partitions/check.c
index 513c601..5fd2b7e 100644
--- a/block/partitions/check.c
+++ b/block/partitions/check.c
@@ -182,11 +182,9 @@ check_partition(struct gendisk *hd, struct block_device *bdev)
if (err)
/* The partition is unrecognized. So report I/O errors if there were any */
res = err;
- if (res) {
- strlcat(state->pp_buf,
- " unable to read partition table\n", PAGE_SIZE);
- printk(KERN_INFO "%s", state->pp_buf);
- }
+ if (res)
+ printk(KERN_INFO "%s unable to read partition table\n",
+ state->pp_buf);
free_page((unsigned long)state->pp_buf);
free_partitions(state);
Thanks
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/