Re: [PATCH] mailbox: arm-mhu: update the binding document

From: Jassi Brar
Date: Tue May 19 2015 - 10:42:37 EST


On 27 April 2015 at 16:22, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> The initial version of the binding document pushed along with the driver
> is not clear/explicit about couple of the required properties namely:
> clocks and clock-names, though the AMBA primecell binding used by the
> arm-mhu specifies them clearly. Without these property the driver will
> not even get probed, so it is mandatory to have them in DT.
>
> This patch adds the above mentioned required properties to the binding.
> It also adds the optional interrupt-names property which is good to have
> along with some minor updates to replace references to the driver with
> the hardware IP.
>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm-mhu.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm-mhu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm-mhu.txt
> index 4971f03f0b33..68146c9a0332 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm-mhu.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm-mhu.txt
> @@ -1,14 +1,15 @@
> -ARM MHU Mailbox Driver
> -======================
> +ARM Message Handling Unit(MHU)
> +==============================
>
> -The ARM's Message-Handling-Unit (MHU) is a mailbox controller that has
> +The ARM's Message Handling Unit (MHU) is a mailbox controller that has
> 3 independent channels/links to communicate with remote processor(s).
> - MHU links are hardwired on a platform. A link raises interrupt for any
> -received data. However, there is no specified way of knowing if the sent
> -data has been read by the remote. This driver assumes the sender polls
> -STAT register and the remote clears it after having read the data.
> -The last channel is specified to be a 'Secure' resource, hence can't be
> -used by Linux running NS.
> +MHU links are hardwired on a platform. A link raises interrupt for any
> +received data. The platform/firmware must clear the STAT register after
> +having receiving the data and sender can poll on the same if the platform
> +lacks interrupt mechanism for sending data to remote processor.
> +
> +Out of 3 channels, the last channel is 'Secure', hence must not be used
> +by OS or any software running in non-secure state.
>
> Mailbox Device Node:
> ====================
> @@ -20,7 +21,15 @@ used by Linux running NS.
> address and length)
> - #mbox-cells Shall be 1 - the index of the channel needed.
> - interrupts: Contains the interrupt information corresponding to
> - each of the 3 links of MHU.
> + each of the MHU links.
> +- clocks phandle to clock for apb pclk as specified in the
> + primecell binding
> +- clock-names Shall be "apb_pclk"
> +
No other Primecell derivative specify 'apb_pclk' ... because people do
know that before mailbox its a an AMBA Primecell class device so its
implied that you look at Primecell bindings. It doesn't hurt to
mention it here again, but it's definitely not worth the alarm you
have been raising.

> +Optional properties:
> +--------------------
> +- interrupt-names contains names of the interrupt in the order in which
> + they were specified in the interrupts property
>
Nopes. arm_mhu.c shouldn't need to have OF dependency.
amba_device.irq[] is good enough just like for other amba drivers.

And the change in documentation above is an unnecessary trainwreck. It
'fixes' nothing, just changes wordings to your taste.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/