RE: [PATCH 2/2] cciss: correct the non-resettable board list

[Don Brace]

 -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Brace
> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 1:56 PM
> To: 'Tomas Henzl'; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; axboe@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] cciss: correct the non-resettable board list
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tomas Henzl [mailto:thenzl@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 10:40 AM
> > To: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: Don Brace; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; axboe@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] cciss: correct the non-resettable board list
> >
> > The hpsa driver carries a more recent version,
> > copy the table from there.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/block/cciss.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/cciss.c b/drivers/block/cciss.c
> > index 48498220cd..0ca65b25ef 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/cciss.c
> > +++ b/drivers/block/cciss.c
> > @@ -582,12 +582,32 @@ static u32 unresettable_controller[] = {
> >  	0x3215103C, /* Smart Array E200i */
> >  	0x3237103C, /* Smart Array E500 */
> >  	0x323D103C, /* Smart Array P700m */
> > +	0x40800E11, /* Smart Array 5i */
> >  	0x409C0E11, /* Smart Array 6400 */
> >  	0x409D0E11, /* Smart Array 6400 EM */
> > +	0x40700E11, /* Smart Array 5300 */
> > +	0x40820E11, /* Smart Array 532 */
> > +	0x40830E11, /* Smart Array 5312 */
> > +	0x409A0E11, /* Smart Array 641 */
> > +	0x409B0E11, /* Smart Array 642 */
> > +	0x40910E11, /* Smart Array 6i */
> >  };
> >
> >  /* List of controllers which cannot even be soft reset */
> >  static u32 soft_unresettable_controller[] = {
> > +	0x40800E11, /* Smart Array 5i */
> > +	0x40700E11, /* Smart Array 5300 */
> > +	0x40820E11, /* Smart Array 532 */
> > +	0x40830E11, /* Smart Array 5312 */
> > +	0x409A0E11, /* Smart Array 641 */
> > +	0x409B0E11, /* Smart Array 642 */
> > +	0x40910E11, /* Smart Array 6i */
> > +	/* Exclude 640x boards.  These are two pci devices in one slot
> > +	 * which share a battery backed cache module.  One controls the
> > +	 * cache, the other accesses the cache through the one that controls
> > +	 * it.  If we reset the one controlling the cache, the other will
> > +	 * likely not be happy.  Just forbid resetting this conjoined mess.
> > +	 */
> >  	0x409C0E11, /* Smart Array 6400 */
> >  	0x409D0E11, /* Smart Array 6400 EM */
> >  };
> > @@ -4663,8 +4683,7 @@ static int cciss_kdump_hard_reset_controller(struct
> > pci_dev *pdev)
> >  	 */
> >  	cciss_lookup_board_id(pdev, &board_id);
> >  	if (!ctlr_is_resettable(board_id)) {
> > -		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Cannot reset Smart Array 640x "
> > -				"due to shared cache module.");
> > +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Controller not resettable\n");
> >  		return -ENODEV;
> >  	}
> >
> > --
> > 1.9.3

Goofed on the last one. Sorry about that.

Signed-off-by Don Brace <don.brace@xxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/