Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] scsi: ufs-qcom: fix compilation warning if compiled as a module

[Paul Bolle]

On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 16:47 +0300, Yaniv Gardi wrote:
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
> @@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ out:
>  
>  #define	ANDROID_BOOT_DEV_MAX	30
>  static char android_boot_dev[ANDROID_BOOT_DEV_MAX];
> -static int get_android_boot_dev(char *str)
> +static int __maybe_unused get_android_boot_dev(char *str)
>  {
>  	strlcpy(android_boot_dev, str, ANDROID_BOOT_DEV_MAX);
>  	return 1;

Wouldn't it be clearer to wrap these few lines (until after the
__setup() macro) with #ifndef MODULE?

And I think get_android_boot_dev() could be marked __init. Because if
it's built-in it will never be called after the kernel has finished
booting, right?


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/