Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] mtrr, mm, x86: Enhance MTRR checks for KVA huge page mapping

[Toshi Kani]

On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 13:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> > @@ -566,19 +566,28 @@ void native_set_fixmap(enum fixed_addresses idx, phys_addr_t phys,
> >  /**
> >   * pud_set_huge - setup kernel PUD mapping
> >   *
> > - * MTRR can override PAT memory types with 4KiB granularity.  Therefore,
> > - * this function does not set up a huge page when the range is covered
> > - * by a non-WB type of MTRR.  MTRR_TYPE_INVALID indicates that MTRR are
> > - * disabled.
> > + * MTRRs can override PAT memory types with 4KiB granularity. Therefore, this
> > + * function sets up a huge page only if any of the following conditions are met:
> > + *
> > + * - MTRRs are disabled, or
> > + *
> > + * - MTRRs are enabled and the range is completely covered by a single MTRR, or
> > + *
> > + * - MTRRs are enabled and the range is not completely covered by a single MTRR
> > + *   but the memory type of the range is WB, even if covered by multiple MTRRs.
> > + *
> > + * Callers should try to decrease page size (1GB -> 2MB -> 4K) if the bigger
> > + * page mapping attempt fails.
> 
> This comment should explain why it's ok in the WB case.
> 
> Also, the phrase 'the memory type of the range' is ambiguous: it might 
> mean the partial MTRR's, or the memory type specified via PAT by the 
> huge-pmd entry.

Agreed.  How about this sentence?

 - MTRRs are enabled and the corresponding MTRR memory type is WB, which
has no effect to the requested PAT memory type.

Thanks,
-Toshi


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/