Re: [RFC v1 10/25] sh: intc: Use irq_desc_get_xxx() to avoid redundant lookup of irq_desc

[Jiang Liu]

On 2015/5/20 23:12, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 20 May 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
> 
>> Use irq_desc_get_xxx() to avoid redundant lookup of irq_desc while we
>> already have a pointer to corresponding irq_desc.
>>
>> Also replace generic_handle_irq with generic_handle_irq_desc() to avoid
>> looking up irq_desc again.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/sh/intc/core.c |    2 +-
>>  drivers/sh/intc/virq.c |   14 ++++++++------
>>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/sh/intc/core.c b/drivers/sh/intc/core.c
>> index 81f22980b2de..e4ca964ca840 100644
>> --- a/drivers/sh/intc/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/sh/intc/core.c
>> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ void intc_set_prio_level(unsigned int irq, unsigned int level)
>>  
>>  static void intc_redirect_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
>>  {
>> -	generic_handle_irq((unsigned int)irq_get_handler_data(irq));
>> +	generic_handle_irq_desc(irq, desc);
> 
> This looks wrong. It's a redirector of irq to some other irq.
> 
>      	redir_irq = (unsigned int)irq_get_handler_data(irq);
> 
> which should be:
> 
>         redir_irq = (unsigned int)irq_desc_get_irq_handler_data(desc);
> 
> And redir_irq is certainly not the same as irq. So this wants a
> conversion to irq_desc_get_irq_handler_data() first. That makes the
> irq argument unused.

Good catch, will fix it in next version.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/