Re: [PATCH 07/10] uprobes/x86: Introduce arch_uretprobe_is_alive()

[Oleg Nesterov]

Hi Pratyush,

sorry for delay, vacation.

On 05/18, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> Hi Oleg,
>
> On Monday 04 May 2015 06:19 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> +bool __weak arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct arch_uretprobe *auret, struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> +	return true;
>> +}
>
> IIUC, then this function should return false when both auret and regs
> are corresponding to same retprobe, else we need to return true, right?

Not sure I understand what you mean...

This function should return false when we know that this return_instance
was invalidated by longjmp().

> If that is the case, then should n't following work for all the cases:
>
> return sp != auret->sp;

No, this can't work.

On x86 "sp == auret->sp" only right after the "call" insn, the stack
can grow after that but this does not mean that this instance is no
longer valid.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/