Re: regulator: da9062: undefined Kconfig option MFD_DA9062

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:53:16PM +0200, Valentin Rothberg wrote:

> > One effect of being too keen to report things is that a high false
> > positive rate will cause people to pay less attention, if the source is
> > usually just generating noise then it gets tuned out.

> Note, that we keep a list of all reported items.  If we know (for
> certain) that something will be applied, we won't report anything
> similar for a longer period of time.

> I don't want those reports to be seen as spam, so I guess we need to
> find a less noisy approach.  It's something I do as a hobby besides my
> PhD, so the only intention is to help, not to annoy people.

I'd expect that holding off on the initial report for a while (at least
a week but I'd guess longer) would probably avoid a lot of noise.  Doing
it immediately is likely to generate lots of false positives simply
because coordinating down to a single day is a lot of effort.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature