* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Em Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:16:51PM +0200, Martin LiÅka escreveu:
On 05/20/2015 04:55 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So the rule has been: What are the kernel requirements for the
toolchain? tools/perf/ should build with that.
So we could use -Og if it works, like Kbuild does it:
KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mno-fp-ret-in-387)
the 'cc-option' Make function does some magic of silently calling GCC
with that option and observing the result.
See:
scripts/Kbuild.include:cc-option = $(call try-run,\
I am sorry, I did mistake in understanding of DEBUG variable.
Following patch should be fixed, except missing auto-detection
of -Og option.
Unfortunately, following hunk does not work, no -Ox is added to CFLAGS?
-- CFLAGS += -Og
++ CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-Og,-O0)
I don't know if we have this cc-option, perhaps Ingo is suggesting
we get it in tools/build/? Or include scripts/Kbuild.include and
then use it?
I.e. we have checks to see if we can use, for instance
-fstack-protector-all, see tools/build/feature/Makefile, using this
cc-option thing, importing it from Kbuild would solve the issue at
hand in a definitive way and in line with what we have been
pursuing: to make the tools/ build system be based on Kbuild.
So I'd suggest copying any necessary functions instead of outright
including all of Kbuild in the tooling build system which creates
non-trivial dependencies that is not necessarily tested as thoroughly
on the kbuild side as on the tooling side.
Thanks,
Ingo