Re: [PATCH v4 10/13] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: checkpatch.pl fixes

[Drokin, Oleg]

On May 22, 2015, at 8:18 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>>> I wonder what is more clear about that in your opinion ve
>>>> lustre_error/lustre_debug?
>>> 
>>> The fact that you have to explain this shows that it's
>>> at least misleading unless you completely understand the
>>> code.
>> 
>> Or you know, you might take the function name at the face value
>> and assume that CERROR means it's an error and CDEBUG means it's a debug message?
> 
> Maybe, but I think that it'd be better if the mechanism
> it uses was more plainly named something like lustre_log.

While the idea seems good, the biggest obstacle here is such that
there's already a thing called lustre log (llog for short too) -
it's kind of a distributed journal of operations.

Its there a different synonym, I wonder?--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/