[PATCH] cpufreq:exynos-cpufreq - Fix for memory leak in case SOC name does not match.
From: Shailendra Verma
Date: Fri May 22 2015 - 23:03:14 EST
During probe free the memory allocated to "exynos_info" in case of
unknown SOC type.
Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 15 +++++++++++----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
index 82d2fbb..5b57a0f 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
@@ -182,20 +182,25 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ret = exynos5250_cpufreq_init(exynos_info);
} else {
pr_err("%s: Unknown SoC type\n", __func__);
- return -ENODEV;
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto err_vdd_arm;
}
- if (ret)
+ if (ret) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
goto err_vdd_arm;
+ }
if (exynos_info->set_freq == NULL) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No set_freq function (ERR)\n");
+ ret = -EINVAL;
goto err_vdd_arm;
}
arm_regulator = regulator_get(NULL, "vdd_arm");
if (IS_ERR(arm_regulator)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get resource vdd_arm\n");
+ ret = -EINVAL;
goto err_vdd_arm;
}
@@ -203,8 +208,10 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
locking_frequency = clk_get_rate(exynos_info->cpu_clk) / 1000;
ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&exynos_driver);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
goto err_cpufreq_reg;
+ }
cpu0 = of_get_cpu_node(0, NULL);
if (!cpu0) {
@@ -227,7 +234,7 @@ err_cpufreq_reg:
regulator_put(arm_regulator);
err_vdd_arm:
kfree(exynos_info);
- return -EINVAL;
+ return ret;
}
static struct platform_driver exynos_cpufreq_platdrv = {
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/