Re: [PATCH] ARM: berlin: add SPI nodes for BG2Q

[Antoine Tenart]

Sebastian,

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:58:35PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 20.05.2015 14:53, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> >The BG2Q SoC has two SPI controllers. Add the corresponding nodes.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >---
> >
> >Based on top of the Berlin clock rework series.
> >
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi
> >index 187d056f7ad2..c25ee86b2bfa 100644
> >--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi
> >+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi
> >@@ -286,6 +286,20 @@
> >  				status = "disabled";
> >  			};
> >
> >+			spi0: spi@1c00 {
> >+				compatible = "snps,dw-apb-ssi";
> >+				reg = <0x1c00 0x100>;
> >+				interrupt-parrent = <&aic>;
> 
> the same question as for the ADC node patch: IIRC you don't have
> to repeat the interrupt-parent property as long as any node upstream
> will have it already.

You're right, I'll remove this. And we have other nodes doing the same
thing, I'll cook up a patch to remove non mandatory interrupt-parent
properties.

> 
> >+				interrupts = <7>;
> >+				clocks = <&chip_clk CLKID_CFG>;
> >+				pinctrl-0 = <&spi0_pmux>;
> >+				pinctrl-names = "default";
> >+				#address-cells = <1>;
> >+				#size-cells = <0>;
> >+				num-cs = <4>;
> >+				status = "disabled";
> >+			};
> >+
> >  			timer0: timer@2c00 {
> >  				compatible = "snps,dw-apb-timer";
> >  				reg = <0x2c00 0x14>;
> >@@ -383,6 +397,11 @@
> >  					groups = "G7";
> >  					function = "twsi1";
> >  				};
> >+
> >+				spi0_pmux: spi0-pmux {
> >+					groups = "G8", "G9", "G10", "G11";
> >+					function = "spi1";
> 
> Hmm, "spi0_pmux" but "spi1" function?

Yep. See below.

> >+				};
> >  			};
> >
> >  			chip_rst: reset {
> >@@ -473,6 +492,20 @@
> >  				};
> >  			};
> >
> >+			spi1: spi@5000 {
> >+				compatible = "snps,dw-apb-ssi";
> >+				reg = <0x6000 0x100>;
> >+				interrupt-parent = <&sic>;
> >+				interrupts = <5>;
> >+				clocks = <&refclk>;
> >+				pinctrl-0 = <&spi1_pmux>;
> >+				pinctrl-names = "default";
> >+				#address-cells = <1>;
> >+				#size-cells = <0>;
> >+				num-cs = <4>;
> >+				status = "disabled";
> >+			};
> >+
> >  			i2c2: i2c@7000 {
> >  				compatible = "snps,designware-i2c";
> >  				#address-cells = <1>;
> >@@ -564,6 +597,11 @@
> >  						groups = "GSM14";
> >  						function = "twsi3";
> >  					};
> >+
> >+					spi1_pmux: spi1-pmux {
> >+						groups = "GSM0", "GSM1", "GSM2", "GSM3";
> >+						function = "spi2";
> 
> ditto.
> 
> I know the internal numbering scheme on BG-SoCs is weird, but it looks like
> that either you are missing the third SPI or there is only 2 and
> numbering starts with 1 *sigh* ;)

There are 2 SPI, starting at 1... :)

> Anyway, the numbering should be consistent with pinctrl function names
> although I would have preferred to start counting with 0.

OK, so we'll have spi1_pmux in the spi0 node. I'll update.

Antoine

-- 
Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/