Re: [PATCH] mm:cma - Fix for typos in comments.

[Michal Nazarewicz]

On Sat, May 23 2015, Shailendra Verma wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  mm/cma.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/cma.c b/mm/cma.c
> index 3a7a67b..6612780 100644
> --- a/mm/cma.c
> +++ b/mm/cma.c
> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ int __init cma_init_reserved_mem(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size,
>  	if (!size || !memblock_is_region_reserved(base, size))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	/* ensure minimal alignment requied by mm core */
> +	/* ensure minimal alignment required by mm core */
>  	alignment = PAGE_SIZE << max(MAX_ORDER - 1, pageblock_order);
>  
>  	/* alignment should be aligned with order_per_bit */
> @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ int __init cma_declare_contiguous(phys_addr_t base,
>  	/*
>  	 * high_memory isn't direct mapped memory so retrieving its physical
>  	 * address isn't appropriate.  But it would be useful to check the
> -	 * physical address of the highmem boundary so it's justfiable to get
> +	 * physical address of the highmem boundary so it's justifiable to get
>  	 * the physical address from it.  On x86 there is a validation check for
>  	 * this case, so the following workaround is needed to avoid it.
>  	 */
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
>

-- 
Best regards,                                         _     _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science,  MichaÅ âmina86â Nazarewicz    (o o)
ooo +--<mpn@xxxxxxxxxx>--<xmpp:mina86@xxxxxxxxxx>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/