Re: [PATCH RFC 09/13] exit: Use for_each_thread() in do_wait()

From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Tue May 26 2015 - 15:47:05 EST


On 05/25, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>
> Refactoring, no functionality change.

Hmm. unless I missed something this change is wrong.

> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -1538,8 +1538,7 @@ static long do_wait(struct wait_opts *wo)
>
> set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> - tsk = current;
> - do {
> + for_each_thread(current, tsk) {
> retval = do_wait_thread(wo, tsk);
> if (retval)
> goto end;
> @@ -1550,7 +1549,7 @@ static long do_wait(struct wait_opts *wo)
>
> if (wo->wo_flags & __WNOTHREAD)
> break;
> - } while_each_thread(current, tsk);
> + }

Please note the __WNOTHREAD check. This is the rare case when we
actually want while_each_thread() (although it should die anyway).

for_each_thread() always starts from ->group_leader, but we need
to start from "current" first.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/