Re: [PATCH 11/12] KVM: x86: add KVM_MEM_X86_SMRAM memory slot flag

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 26/05/2015 20:45, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Is this generic enough?  For example, a system could configure itself so
> that an SMRAM region goes to mmio, hiding real RAM.

That would work, because in !SMM you'd go to userspace and do MMIO
there.  But this is absolutely not generic enough.  Your proposed
alternative of having two tables is really neat to implement in both KVM
and QEMU.

Paolo

> 
> I see two alternatives:
> 
> - have three states: SMM, !SMM, both
> - define two tables: SMM, !SMM, both spanning the entire address space
> 
> you should probably document how dirty bitmap handling happens in the
> presence of SMM.
> 
>> +
>>   It is recommended to use this API instead of the
>> KVM_SET_MEMORY_REGION ioctl.
>>   The KVM_SET_MEMORY_REGION does not allow fine grained control over
>> memory
>>   allocation and is deprecated.
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> index 30100a3c1bed..46df15bc844f 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@
>>   #define __KVM_HAVE_XCRS
>>   #define __KVM_HAVE_READONLY_MEM
>>   +#define __KVM_ARCH_VALID_FLAGS        KVM_MEM_X86_SMRAM
>> +#define KVM_MEM_X86_SMRAM        (1 << 24)
>> +
>>   /* Architectural interrupt line count. */
>>   #define KVM_NR_INTERRUPTS 256
>>   diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/smram.c b/arch/x86/kvm/smram.c
>> index 73616edab631..e7dd933673a4 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/smram.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/smram.c
>> @@ -19,10 +19,23 @@
>>     #include <linux/module.h>
>>   #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>> +#include "kvm_cache_regs.h"
>>     struct kvm_memory_slot *x86_gfn_to_memslot(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> gfn_t gfn)
>>   {
>> -    struct kvm_memory_slot *slot = gfn_to_memslot(vcpu->kvm, gfn);
>> +    /* By using search_memslots directly the compiler can optimize away
>> +     * the "if (found)" check below.
>> +         *
>> +     * It cannot do the same for gfn_to_memslot because it is not
>> inlined,
>> +     * and it also cannot do the same for __gfn_to_memslot because the
>> +     * kernel is compiled with -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks.
>> +     */
>> +    bool found;
>> +    struct kvm_memslots *memslots = kvm_memslots(vcpu->kvm);
>> +    struct kvm_memory_slot *slot = search_memslots(memslots, gfn,
>> &found);
>> +
>> +    if (found && unlikely(slot->flags & KVM_MEM_X86_SMRAM) &&
>> !is_smm(vcpu))
>> +        return NULL;
>>         return slot;
>>   }
>> @@ -112,7 +125,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(x86_read_guest);
>>   int x86_gfn_to_hva_cache_init(struct kvm *kvm, struct
>> gfn_to_hva_cache *ghc,
>>                     gpa_t gpa, unsigned long len)
>>   {
>> -    return kvm_gfn_to_hva_cache_init(kvm, ghc, gpa, len);
>> +    int r = kvm_gfn_to_hva_cache_init(kvm, ghc, gpa, len);
>> +
>> +    if (r < 0)
>> +        return r;
>> +
>> +    /* Use slow path for reads and writes to SMRAM.  */
>> +    if (ghc->memslot && (ghc->memslot->flags & KVM_MEM_X86_SMRAM))
>> +        ghc->memslot = NULL;
>> +    return r;
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(x86_gfn_to_hva_cache_init);
>>   diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
>> index 19d09a08885b..ae7c60262369 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -810,16 +810,18 @@ static inline void kvm_guest_exit(void)
>>    * gfn_to_memslot() itself isn't here as an inline because that would
>>    * bloat other code too much.
>>    */
>> -static inline struct kvm_memory_slot *
>> -search_memslots(struct kvm_memslots *slots, gfn_t gfn)
>> +static __always_inline struct kvm_memory_slot *
>> +search_memslots(struct kvm_memslots *slots, gfn_t gfn, bool *found)
>>   {
>>       int start = 0, end = slots->used_slots;
>>       int slot = atomic_read(&slots->lru_slot);
>>       struct kvm_memory_slot *memslots = slots->memslots;
>>         if (gfn >= memslots[slot].base_gfn &&
>> -        gfn < memslots[slot].base_gfn + memslots[slot].npages)
>> +        gfn < memslots[slot].base_gfn + memslots[slot].npages) {
>> +        *found = true;
>>           return &memslots[slot];
>> +    }
>>         while (start < end) {
>>           slot = start + (end - start) / 2;
>> @@ -833,16 +835,20 @@ search_memslots(struct kvm_memslots *slots,
>> gfn_t gfn)
>>       if (gfn >= memslots[start].base_gfn &&
>>           gfn < memslots[start].base_gfn + memslots[start].npages) {
>>           atomic_set(&slots->lru_slot, start);
>> +        *found = true;
>>           return &memslots[start];
>>       }
>>   +    *found = false;
>>       return NULL;
>>   }
>>     static inline struct kvm_memory_slot *
>>   __gfn_to_memslot(struct kvm_memslots *slots, gfn_t gfn)
>>   {
>> -    return search_memslots(slots, gfn);
>> +    bool found;
>> +
>> +    return search_memslots(slots, gfn, &found);
>>   }
>>     static inline unsigned long
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> index 0fcc5d28f3a9..46bff2082479 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> @@ -716,6 +716,10 @@ static int check_memory_region_flags(struct
>> kvm_userspace_memory_region *mem)
>>   #ifdef __KVM_HAVE_READONLY_MEM
>>       valid_flags |= KVM_MEM_READONLY;
>>   #endif
>> +#ifdef __KVM_ARCH_VALID_FLAGS
>> +    BUILD_BUG_ON(__KVM_ARCH_VALID_FLAGS & KVM_MEMSLOT_INVALID);
>> +    valid_flags |= __KVM_ARCH_VALID_FLAGS;
>> +#endif
>>         if (mem->flags & ~valid_flags)
>>           return -EINVAL;
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/