[PATCH v3] net: tcp: Fix a PTO timing granularity issue

From: Ido Yariv
Date: Thu May 21 2015 - 02:23:13 EST


The Tail Loss Probe RFC specifies that the PTO value should be set to
max(2 * SRTT, 10ms), where SRTT is the smoothed round-trip time.

The PTO value is converted to jiffies, so the timer may expire
prematurely.

This is especially problematic on systems in which HZ <= 100, so work
around this by setting the timeout to at least 2 jiffies on such
systems.

The 10ms figure was originally selected based on tests performed with
the current implementation and HZ = 1000. Thus, leave the behavior on
systems with HZ > 100 unchanged.

Signed-off-by: Ido Yariv <idox.yariv@xxxxxxxxx>
---
include/net/tcp.h | 9 +++++++++
net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
index 2bb2bad..86090b6 100644
--- a/include/net/tcp.h
+++ b/include/net/tcp.h
@@ -1751,4 +1751,13 @@ static inline void skb_set_tcp_pure_ack(struct sk_buff *skb)
skb->truesize = 2;
}

+/* Convert msecs to jiffies, ensuring that the return value is always at least
+ * 2. This can be used when setting tick-based timers to guarantee that they
+ * won't expire right away.
+ */
+static inline unsigned long tcp_safe_msecs_to_jiffies(const unsigned int m)
+{
+ return max_t(u32, 2, msecs_to_jiffies(m));
+}
+
#endif /* _TCP_H */
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index 534e5fd..83021c5 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -2207,7 +2207,7 @@ bool tcp_schedule_loss_probe(struct sock *sk)
if (tp->packets_out == 1)
timeout = max_t(u32, timeout,
(rtt + (rtt >> 1) + TCP_DELACK_MAX));
- timeout = max_t(u32, timeout, msecs_to_jiffies(10));
+ timeout = max_t(u32, timeout, tcp_safe_msecs_to_jiffies(10));

/* If RTO is shorter, just schedule TLP in its place. */
tlp_time_stamp = tcp_time_stamp + timeout;
--
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/