Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: remove duplicated code with __clk_set_parent_after
From: Michael Turquette
Date: Thu May 28 2015 - 00:09:40 EST
Quoting Dong Aisheng (2015-05-14 06:28:59)
> __clk_set_parent_after() actually used the second argument then we
> could put this duplicate logic in there and call it with a different
> order of arguments in the success vs. error paths in this function.
>
> Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Patch looks good to me.
Also just noticed that the second argument to __clk_set_parent_after is
never used :-(
Regards,
Mike
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 8 +-------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index 659f2b0..0e813ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -1159,14 +1159,8 @@ static int __clk_set_parent(struct clk_core *core, struct clk_core *parent,
> flags = clk_enable_lock();
> clk_reparent(core, old_parent);
> clk_enable_unlock(flags);
> + __clk_set_parent_after(core, old_parent, parent);
>
> - if (core->prepare_count) {
> - flags = clk_enable_lock();
> - clk_core_disable(core);
> - clk_core_disable(parent);
> - clk_enable_unlock(flags);
> - clk_core_unprepare(parent);
> - }
> return ret;
> }
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/