Re: [PATCH] perf tools: introduce arm64 support unwind test.
From: Wangnan (F)
Date: Thu May 28 2015 - 03:18:00 EST
Ping?
On 2015/3/27 21:08, Wang Nan wrote:
Newest libunwind does support ARM64, and perf is able to utilize it
also. This patch enables the missing perf test dwarf unwind for arm64.
Test result:
# ./perf test unwind
25: Test dwarf unwind : Ok
Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/arch/arm64/Build | 1 +
tools/perf/arch/arm64/include/perf_regs.h | 3 ++
tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/Build | 2 +
tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/dwarf-unwind.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/regs_load.S | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++
tools/perf/tests/Build | 2 +-
tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c | 2 +-
tools/perf/tests/tests.h | 2 +-
8 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/Build
create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/dwarf-unwind.c
create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/regs_load.S
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/Build b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/Build
index 54afe4a..41bf61d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/Build
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/Build
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
libperf-y += util/
+libperf-$(CONFIG_DWARF_UNWIND) += tests/
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/include/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/include/perf_regs.h
index 1d3f39c..4e5af27 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/include/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/include/perf_regs.h
@@ -5,8 +5,11 @@
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <asm/perf_regs.h>
+void perf_regs_load(u64 *regs);
+
#define PERF_REGS_MASK ((1ULL << PERF_REG_ARM64_MAX) - 1)
#define PERF_REGS_MAX PERF_REG_ARM64_MAX
+#define PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64
#define PERF_REG_IP PERF_REG_ARM64_PC
#define PERF_REG_SP PERF_REG_ARM64_SP
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/Build b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/Build
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b30eff9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/Build
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+libperf-y += regs_load.o
+libperf-y += dwarf-unwind.o
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/dwarf-unwind.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/dwarf-unwind.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cf04a4c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/dwarf-unwind.c
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+#include <string.h>
+#include "perf_regs.h"
+#include "thread.h"
+#include "map.h"
+#include "event.h"
+#include "debug.h"
+#include "tests/tests.h"
+
+#define STACK_SIZE 8192
+
+static int sample_ustack(struct perf_sample *sample,
+ struct thread *thread, u64 *regs)
+{
+ struct stack_dump *stack = &sample->user_stack;
+ struct map *map;
+ unsigned long sp;
+ u64 stack_size, *buf;
+
+ buf = malloc(STACK_SIZE);
+ if (!buf) {
+ pr_debug("failed to allocate sample uregs data\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ sp = (unsigned long) regs[PERF_REG_ARM64_SP];
+
+ map = map_groups__find(thread->mg, MAP__VARIABLE, (u64) sp);
+ if (!map) {
+ pr_debug("failed to get stack map\n");
+ free(buf);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ stack_size = map->end - sp;
+ stack_size = stack_size > STACK_SIZE ? STACK_SIZE : stack_size;
+
+ memcpy(buf, (void *) sp, stack_size);
+ stack->data = (char *) buf;
+ stack->size = stack_size;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int test__arch_unwind_sample(struct perf_sample *sample,
+ struct thread *thread)
+{
+ struct regs_dump *regs = &sample->user_regs;
+ u64 *buf;
+
+ buf = calloc(1, sizeof(u64) * PERF_REGS_MAX);
+ if (!buf) {
+ pr_debug("failed to allocate sample uregs data\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ perf_regs_load(buf);
+ regs->abi = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI;
+ regs->regs = buf;
+ regs->mask = PERF_REGS_MASK;
+
+ return sample_ustack(sample, thread, buf);
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/regs_load.S b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/regs_load.S
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..025b46e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/regs_load.S
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+#include <linux/linkage.h>
+
+.text
+.type perf_regs_load,%function
+#define STR_REG(r) str x##r, [x0, 8 * r]
+#define LDR_REG(r) ldr x##r, [x0, 8 * r]
+#define SP (8 * 31)
+#define PC (8 * 32)
+ENTRY(perf_regs_load)
+ STR_REG(0)
+ STR_REG(1)
+ STR_REG(2)
+ STR_REG(3)
+ STR_REG(4)
+ STR_REG(5)
+ STR_REG(6)
+ STR_REG(7)
+ STR_REG(8)
+ STR_REG(9)
+ STR_REG(10)
+ STR_REG(11)
+ STR_REG(12)
+ STR_REG(13)
+ STR_REG(14)
+ STR_REG(15)
+ STR_REG(16)
+ STR_REG(17)
+ STR_REG(18)
+ STR_REG(19)
+ STR_REG(20)
+ STR_REG(21)
+ STR_REG(22)
+ STR_REG(23)
+ STR_REG(24)
+ STR_REG(25)
+ STR_REG(26)
+ STR_REG(27)
+ STR_REG(28)
+ STR_REG(29)
+ STR_REG(30)
+ mov x1, sp
+ str x1, [x0, #SP]
+ str x30, [x0, #PC]
+ LDR_REG(1)
+ ret
+ENDPROC(perf_regs_load)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/Build b/tools/perf/tests/Build
index 6a8801b..67f48e6 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/Build
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/Build
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ perf-y += kmod-path.o
perf-$(CONFIG_X86) += perf-time-to-tsc.o
-ifeq ($(ARCH),$(filter $(ARCH),x86 arm))
+ifeq ($(ARCH),$(filter $(ARCH),x86 arm arm64))
perf-$(CONFIG_DWARF_UNWIND) += dwarf-unwind.o
endif
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
index 4f40981..63b0d27 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static struct test {
.desc = "Test parsing with no sample_id_all bit set",
.func = test__parse_no_sample_id_all,
},
-#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__) || defined(__arm__)
+#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__) || defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__)
#ifdef HAVE_DWARF_UNWIND_SUPPORT
{
.desc = "Test dwarf unwind",
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/tests.h b/tools/perf/tests/tests.h
index 52758a3..a94ea87 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/tests.h
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/tests.h
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ int test__fdarray__filter(void);
int test__fdarray__add(void);
int test__kmod_path__parse(void);
-#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__) || defined(__arm__)
+#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__) || defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__)
#ifdef HAVE_DWARF_UNWIND_SUPPORT
struct thread;
struct perf_sample;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/