Hi Chanwoo,
On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 21:15 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Previously, I discussed how to inform the changed state of both ID
and VBUS pin for USB connector on patch-set[1].
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/2/310
So, this patch adds the extcon_set_cable_line_state() function to inform
the additional state of external connectors without additional register/
unregister functions. This function uses the existing notifier chain
which is registered by extcon_register_notifier() / extcon_register_interest().
The extcon_set_cable_line_state() can inform the new state of both
ID and VBUS pin state through extcon_set_cable_line_state().
For exmaple:
- On extcon-usb-gpio.c as extcon provider driver as following:
static void usb_extcon_detect_cable(struct work_struct *work)
{
...
/* check ID and update cable state */
id = gpiod_get_value_cansleep(info->id_gpiod);
if (id) {
extcon_set_cable_state_(info->edev, EXTCON_USB_HOST, false);
extcon_set_cable_state_(info->edev, EXTCON_USB, true);
extcon_set_cable_line_state(info->edev, EXTCON_USB,
EXTCON_USB_ID_HIGH);
I am getting more and more confused :-). Why EXTCON_USB is now used for ID notifications?
It should be EXTCON_USB_HOST, no? Why we need another function, framework already have
required information from the function one line above, do I miss something?
--
} else {
extcon_set_cable_state_(info->edev, EXTCON_USB, false);
extcon_set_cable_state_(info->edev, EXTCON_USB_HOST, true);
extcon_set_cable_line_state(info->edev, EXTCON_USB,
EXTCON_USB_ID_LOW);
}
}
- On specific extcon consumder driver as following:
static int xxx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct notifier_chain nh;
nb.notifier_call = extcon_usb_notifier;
ret = extcon_register_notifier(edev, EXTCON_USB, &nb);
This is bit misleading. 'nb' could not be in stack.
Regards,
Ivan