Re: [PATCH 1/2] rcu: introduce list_last_or_null_rcu

[Dan Streetman]

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 May 2015 17:19:40 -0400
> Dan Streetman <ddstreet@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> >> oh, ok.  how do we do type-generic inline funcs?  return void*?
>> >
>> > I was hoping that you would tell me.  I use macros in that case.
>>
>> ha, if I ever get to the point where i think i know more than you,
>> i'll let you know ;-)
>
> static inline struct list_head *
> list_last_or_null_rcu(struct list_head *ptr)
> {
>         struct list_head *entry;
>         struct list_head *last;
>
>         for (entry = list_next_rcu(ptr);
>              entry != ptr; entry = list_next_rcu(entry))
>                 last = __entry;
>         if (last != ptr)
>                 return last;
>         return NULL;
> }
>
> #define list_last_or_null_entry_rcu(ptr, type, member) \
> ({ \
>         struct list_head *__ptr = list_last_or_null_rcu(ptr); \
>         __ptr ? list_entry_rcu(__ptr, type, member) : NULL; \
> })

well sure :-)

however, the rcu list function currently doesn't include "entry" in
the function name, but returns the list entry (not the list_head).
that could be changed, but all callers would need to change, too.

>
> -- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/