Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] latched RB-trees and __module_address()

[Rusty Russell]

Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:37:17AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> That's rcu_read_lock_sched_held, not rcu_held_lock_sched_held().
>> 
>> Also, your unlikely is weird and backwards.
>> 
>> I changed it as below, and folded.  It's in modules-next.
>> 
>> I'm now going to do some *actual* testing, and I'll go all Torvalds on
>> you if this spews warnings...
>
> Fair enough, I did see the build robot fail on this. How come those only
> showed up now? This patch has been in your git tree for a long time; you
> picked up the rcu validation patches before the other ones.

Indeed...

Fengguang, is the kbuild test robot checking my pending-rebases tree?
It's probably going to produce some noise (since that's where I drop
unreviewed patches, too), but that's OK.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/