Re: [PATCH RFC] s390/sclp: pass timeout as HZ independent value

[Nicholas Mc Guire]

On Fri, 29 May 2015, Heiko Carstens wrote:

> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:51:54AM +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 May 2015, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > Yes, the orginal code seems to be broken. Since I've no idea what the intended
> > > timeout value should be, let's simply ask Michael, who wrote this code eight
> > > years ago ;)
> > > While these lines get touched anyway, it would make sense to use
> > > schedule_timeout_interruptible() instead, and get rid of set_current_state().
> > >
> > Well that is not really equivalent
> > schedule_timeout_interruptible() is doing
> > __set_current_state not set_current_state
> > so that would drop the mb() and no WRITE_ONCE()
> 
> And how does that matter in this case?
>
I do not know - did not look into it - in any case
its not a 1:1 API consolidation that all I wanted to point out
before changing anything.

thx!
hofrat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/