Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: fix -i option, which is currently ignored.

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Fri, May 29, 2015 at 02:06:44PM +0200, Martin LiÅka escreveu:
> Assign input_name, received from program arguments, to
> file data structure.

Doesn't apply:

pat[acme@zoo linux]$ patch -p1 < /wb/1.patch 
patching file tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 289.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 346.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c.rej
[acme@zoo linux]$

What branch is this intended for? I.e. where have you cloned this from?

Yeah, I reproduced the problem and will try to figure this out, but
please always be explicit where to apply this.

- Arnaldo
 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Liska <mliska@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
> index c434e12..4e08c2d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
> @@ -289,7 +289,6 @@ int cmd_annotate(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
>  		},
>  	};
>  	struct perf_data_file file = {
> -		.path  = input_name,
>  		.mode  = PERF_DATA_MODE_READ,
>  	};
>  	const struct option options[] = {
> @@ -346,6 +345,8 @@ int cmd_annotate(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
>  	else if (annotate.use_gtk)
>  		use_browser = 2;
> +	file.path  = input_name;
> +
>  	setup_browser(true);
>  	annotate.session = perf_session__new(&file, false, &annotate.tool);
> -- 
> 2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/