Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: Document the STM32F4 clock bindings

From: Daniel Thompson
Date: Mon Jun 01 2015 - 03:47:16 EST


On 30/05/15 10:21, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
HI Daniel,

On 05/30/2015 09:54 AM, Daniel Thompson wrote:
This adds documentation of device tree bindings for the clock related
portions of the STM32 RCC block.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32-rcc.txt | 65
++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
<snip>
+Example:
+
+ /* Gated clock, AHB1 bit 0 (GPIOA) */
+ ... {
+ clocks = <&rcc 0 0>
+ };
+
+ /* Gated clock, AHB2 bit 4 (GPIOA) */
s/GPIOA/CRYP/

Oops! Will fix.


+ ... {
+ clocks = <&rcc 0 36>
+ };
+
+Specifying other clocks
+=======================
+
+The primary index must be set to 1.
+
+The secondary index is bound with the following magic numbers:
+
+ 0 SYSTICK
+ 1 FCLK
How do you plan to handle the SAI & I2S clocks?
By adding index 3?

Pretty much. Tentatively I'm thinking of:

2 I2S clocks
3 SAI1_A clock
4 SAI1_B clock
5 LCD-TFT clock

Note: Sort order is based on the vertical ordering in the clock tree diagram in the data sheet.

Only reason not to include these in the bindings immediately is that I wanted to check how/if these clocks are gated. The clock tree diagram shows them having individual clock gates so before proposing them using magic numbers I wanted to double check if these values can be identified at gates clocks.


Daniel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/