Re: linux-next: manual merge of the target-updates tree with the tree

From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Mon Jun 01 2015 - 07:57:21 EST

Next message: Baolin Wang: "[PATCH v4 11/25] posix-timers:Change the implementation for clock_settime syscall function"
Previous message: Baolin Wang: "[PATCH v4 10/25] posix-timers:Convert to the 64bit methods for the timer_settime syscall function"
In reply to: Nicholas A. Bellinger: "Re: linux-next: manual merge of the target-updates tree with the tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Nicholas,

On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 04:35:52 -0700 "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Apologies for the conflicts vs. mainline in today's linux-next
>
> The latest in target-pending/for-next from this morning should address
> these conflicts vs. mainline.

Thanks, tomorrow should be better :-)

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgp2s_n5m5JcF.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Next message: Baolin Wang: "[PATCH v4 11/25] posix-timers:Change the implementation for clock_settime syscall function"
Previous message: Baolin Wang: "[PATCH v4 10/25] posix-timers:Convert to the 64bit methods for the timer_settime syscall function"
In reply to: Nicholas A. Bellinger: "Re: linux-next: manual merge of the target-updates tree with the tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]