Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: dts: mt8173: support arm64 cpuidle-dt
From: Howard Chen
Date: Tue Jun 02 2015 - 03:17:38 EST
On 29 May 2015 at 22:55, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:01:46AM +0100, Howard Chen wrote:
>> This patch adds an idle-states node to describe the mt8173 idle states and
>> also adds references to the idle-states node in all CPU nodes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Howard Chen <howard.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
> You should have added a list of incremental changes (v1->v2->v3) here
> otherwise there is no point in adding a patch version, we are not
> supposed to remember what you have changed.
>
OK.
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
>> index 924fdb6..47e8d56 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
>> @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@
>> device_type = "cpu";
>> compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
>> reg = <0x000>;
>> + enable-method = "psci";
>> + cpu-idle-states = <&CPU_SLEEP_0>;
>> };
>>
>> cpu1: cpu@1 {
>> @@ -56,6 +58,7 @@
>> compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
>> reg = <0x001>;
>> enable-method = "psci";
>> + cpu-idle-states = <&CPU_SLEEP_0>;
>> };
>>
>> cpu2: cpu@100 {
>> @@ -63,6 +66,7 @@
>> compatible = "arm,cortex-a57";
>> reg = <0x100>;
>> enable-method = "psci";
>> + cpu-idle-states = <&CPU_SLEEP_0>;
>> };
>>
>> cpu3: cpu@101 {
>> @@ -70,6 +74,20 @@
>> compatible = "arm,cortex-a57";
>> reg = <0x101>;
>> enable-method = "psci";
>> + cpu-idle-states = <&CPU_SLEEP_0>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + idle-states {
>> + entry-method = "arm,psci";
>> +
>> + CPU_SLEEP_0: cpu-sleep-0 {
>> + compatible = "arm,idle-state";
>
> UltraNit: please move local-timer-stop here to keep the property ordering
> as in the bindings.
OK.
>
> More importantly, IIRC the idle state was not local-timer-stop in v2,
My original idea is to hand over to a general purpose timer when the
local timer stops, however, Danienl Lezcano naked this and points out cases
that it may misbehave. So I fall back to the generic approach which uses the
broadcast timer on the v3 patch.
> what changed in the interim ? v1->v2 the cluster idle state disappeared,
The cluster idle won't be available in the near future and possibly never will,
while the C1 state is ready and stable, so I split the C1 part out.
> now the local timer seems to stop when it was not before (and that is
> the same HW), I hope things are settled now.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/7/76
>
>> + arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x0010000>;
>
> Move this property as last on the list, let's keep the generic
> properties first.
OK.
>
>> + entry-latency-us = <639>;
>> + exit-latency-us = <680>;
>> + min-residency-us = <1088>;
>> + local-timer-stop;
>> + };
>> };
>> };
>
> I guess there is no hope of seeing the cluster state restored (?).
>
> I would like some explanation regarding local-timer-stop change, apart
> from that you can add:
>
> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>
Many thanks for your review and all the great comments.
Regards,
Howard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/