Re: [RFC][PATCH] regmap: Add reg_sequence for use with multi_reg_write / register_patch

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 10:20:12AM +0100, Nariman Poushin wrote:

>  it be accepted), should I:
> 	- Squash all the updates in to this patch (I suppose the benefit
> 	  there is that we don't break the kernel build from one patch
> 	  to the other)

You need to squash the changes in since they break bisection if handled
separately.  It would be better to do this by having a separate patch to
add the newly named structure rather than adding the new functionality
at the same time.  That makes the patch more mechanical and easier to
review.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature