Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] mfd: cros_ec: Support multiple EC in a system
From: Lee Jones
Date: Wed Jun 03 2015 - 04:54:02 EST
On Tue, 02 Jun 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> From: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Chromebooks can have more than one Embedded Controller so the
> cros_ec device id has to be incremented for each EC registered.
>
> Add code to handle multiple EC. First ec found is cros-ec0,
> second cros-ec1 and so on.
>
> Add a new structure to represent multiple EC as different char
> devices (e.g: /dev/cros_ec, /dev/cros_pd). It connects to
> cros_ec_device and allows sysfs inferface for cros_pd.
>
> Also reduce number of allocated objects, make chromeos sysfs
> class object a static and add refcounting to prevent object
> deletion while command is in progress.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Changes since v3:
> - Add defines for the EC and PD index constants.
> - Remove cros_ec_dev_register() and declare the mfd_cells as static structs.
> Suggested by Lee Jones.
> - Add a new line before the return statement in cros_ec_dev_register().
> Suggested by Lee Jones.
>
> Changes since v2: None
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Squash patch that adds support to represent EC's as different
> char devices (e.g: /dev/cros_ec, /dev/cros_pd):
> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/217297/
> Suggested by Gwendal Grignou
> - Use cros_ec instead of cros-ec in the subject line to be consistent.
> Suggested by Gwendal Grignou
> ---
> drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c | 2 +-
> drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c | 59 +++++++++++--
> drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c | 1 -
> drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c | 1 -
> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_dev.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_dev.h | 7 --
> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lightbar.c | 75 +++++++++--------
> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c | 1 -
> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sysfs.c | 48 +++++------
> include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h | 44 ++++++++--
> 10 files changed, 240 insertions(+), 126 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c
> index 974154a74505..b01966dc7eb3 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c
> @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static int cros_ec_keyb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ckdev->dev = dev;
> dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, ckdev);
>
> - idev->name = ec->ec_name;
> + idev->name = CROS_EC_DEV_NAME;
> idev->phys = ec->phys_name;
> __set_bit(EV_REP, idev->evbit);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c
> index 08d82bfc5268..4fbb4ce8f81e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c
> @@ -24,11 +24,29 @@
> #include <linux/mfd/core.h>
> #include <linux/mfd/cros_ec.h>
>
> -static const struct mfd_cell cros_devs[] = {
> - {
> - .name = "cros-ec-ctl",
> - .id = PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> - },
> +#define CROS_EC_DEV_EC_INDEX 0
> +#define CROS_EC_DEV_PD_INDEX 1
> +
> +struct cros_ec_platform ec_p = {
> + .cmd_offset = EC_CMD_PASSTHRU_OFFSET(CROS_EC_DEV_EC_INDEX),
> +};
> +
> +struct cros_ec_platform pd_p = {
> + .cmd_offset = EC_CMD_PASSTHRU_OFFSET(CROS_EC_DEV_PD_INDEX),
> +};
> +
> +struct mfd_cell ec_cell = {
> + .name = "cros-ec-ctl",
> + .id = PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> + .platform_data = &ec_p,
> + .pdata_size = sizeof(ec_p),
> +};
> +
> +struct mfd_cell ec_pd_cell = {
> + .name = "cros-ec-ctl",
> + .id = PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> + .platform_data = &pd_p,
> + .pdata_size = sizeof(pd_p),
> };
>
> int cros_ec_register(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev)
> @@ -52,14 +70,39 @@ int cros_ec_register(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev)
>
> cros_ec_query_all(ec_dev);
>
> - err = mfd_add_devices(dev, 0, cros_devs,
> - ARRAY_SIZE(cros_devs),
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node)
> + ec_p.ec_name = of_get_property(dev->of_node, "devname",
> + NULL);
Has this binding already been accepted? We don't normally allow
"device name"properties in DT.
> + if (!ec_p.ec_name)
> + ec_p.ec_name = CROS_EC_DEV_NAME;
> +
> + err = mfd_add_devices(ec_dev->dev, CROS_EC_DEV_EC_INDEX, &ec_cell, 1,
> NULL, ec_dev->irq, NULL);
Take a look at how 'id' (second argument) is handled in mfd-core, then
try to figure out why what you're doing is not correct.
> if (err) {
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to add mfd devices\n");
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to add ec\n");
> return err;
> }
[...]
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/