RE: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Prefer kcalloc over kzalloc with multiply

[Gil Fruchter]

On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 16:26:28 +0300
> Gil Fruchter <gilf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> fix checkpatch warning for using kzalloc with multiply:
>> WARNING: Prefer kcalloc over kzalloc with multiply
>> + iter->buffer_iter = kzalloc(sizeof(*iter->buffer_iter)
>> 						* num_possible_cpus(),
> 
> I'm not against applying this patch, but "fix checkpatch warning" is never rational for a change.
> 
> This should say something like, "Use kcalloc for allocating an array instead of a simple multiplier with kzalloc, as that is what kcalloc is used for."
> 
> In other words, if checkpatch found something that should be change, have the change log tell us why it should be changed. You can than add a "Found with checkpatch" to give checkpatch the credit.
> 
> -- Steve
> 

Thanks for the input Steve.
I will create a v2 with an appropriate explanation for this change.

Can I add a Reviewed-by tag by you?

Gil 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/