[RFC PATCH 2/2] mmc: core.c: Add comment to clarify special cases of ERASE/TRIM

[David Jander]

Signed-off-by: David Jander <david@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
index 6c9611b..b6aa9ad 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
@@ -2109,11 +2109,20 @@ int mmc_erase(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int from, unsigned int nr,
 	    !(card->ext_csd.sec_feature_support & EXT_CSD_SEC_GB_CL_EN))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
+	/*
+	 * Sanity check: If we do not erase aligned, whole erase-groups, return
+	 * an error, since we intended a "secure" erase, silently not erasing
+	 * something would be unacceptable.
+	 */
 	if (arg == MMC_SECURE_ERASE_ARG) {
 		if (from % card->erase_size || nr % card->erase_size)
 			return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Make sure only erase-groups that are fully contained in the erase
+	 * region are erased. Silently ignore the rest.
+	 */
 	if (arg == MMC_ERASE_ARG) {
 		rem = from % card->erase_size;
 		if (rem) {
@@ -2140,6 +2149,14 @@ int mmc_erase(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int from, unsigned int nr,
 	/* 'from' and 'to' are inclusive */
 	to -= 1;
 
+	/*
+	 * Special case where only one erase-group fits in the timout budget:
+	 * If the region crosses an erase-group boundary on this particular
+	 * case, we will be trimming more than one erase-group which, does not
+	 * fit in the timeout budget of the controller, so we need to split it
+	 * and call mmc_do_erase() twice if necessary. This special case is
+	 * identified by the card->eg_boundary flag.
+	 */
 	if ((arg & MMC_TRIM_ARGS) && (card->eg_boundary) &&
 	    (from % card->erase_size)) {
 		rem = card->erase_size - (from % card->erase_size);
@@ -2244,7 +2261,16 @@ static unsigned int mmc_do_calc_max_discard(struct mmc_card *card,
 	if (!qty)
 		return 0;
 
-	/* We can only erase one erase group special case */
+	/*
+	 * When specifying a sector range to trim, chances are we might cross
+	 * an erase-group boundary even if the amount of sectors is less than
+	 * one erase-group.
+	 * If we can only fit one erase-group in the controller timeout budget,
+	 * we have to care that erase-group boundaries are not crossed by a
+	 * single trim operation. We flag that special case with "eg_boundary".
+	 * In all other cases we can just decrement qty and pretend that we
+	 * always touch (qty + 1) erase-groups as a simple optimization.
+	 */
 	if (qty == 1)
 		card->eg_boundary = 1;
 	else
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/